Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Patient-controlled analgesia.

R C Etches1

  • 1Wickham Terrace Anaesthesia, Arnold Janssen Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

The Surgical Clinics of North America
|June 3, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) offers superior pain relief compared to traditional methods. However, evidence does not yet support faster recovery or reduced complications with PCA, which requires experienced staff for safe use.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Continuous epidural ropivacaine 0.2% for analgesia after lower abdominal surgery.

Anesthesia and analgesia·1997
Same author

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia after thoracotomy: a comparison of meperidine with and without bupivacaine.

Anesthesia and analgesia·1996
Same author

Continuous intravenous administration of ketorolac reduces pain and morphine consumption after total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Anesthesia and analgesia·1995
Same author

Patient satisfaction.

Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie·1994
Same author

Respiratory depression associated with patient-controlled analgesia: a review of eight cases.

Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie·1994
Same author

A comparison of the analgesic and respiratory effects of epidural nalbuphine or morphine in postthoracotomy patients.

Anesthesiology·1991

Area of Science:

  • Pain Management
  • Anesthesiology
  • Postoperative Care

Background:

  • Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is a method for pain management.
  • Traditional intramuscular (IM) prn opioid administration is a common alternative.
  • The comparative benefits of PCA beyond analgesia are not well-established.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of PCA in pain management.
  • To determine if PCA offers advantages in reducing morbidity or accelerating recovery.
  • To assess the practical requirements for safe and effective PCA implementation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing evidence on PCA efficacy and patient outcomes.
  • Comparison of PCA with traditional IM prn opioid administration.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of factors contributing to safe and effective PCA use.

    • Main Results:

    • PCA provides superior analgesia compared to traditional IM prn opioid administration in selected patients.
    • No compelling evidence currently demonstrates that PCA reduces morbidity or speeds recovery.
    • Effective and safe PCA requires experienced healthcare professionals, frequent patient assessment, and skilled nursing staff.

    Conclusions:

    • PCA is a safe and effective method for providing superior analgesia.
    • Further research is needed to confirm benefits in reducing morbidity and improving recovery times.
    • Safe implementation of PCA necessitates careful patient selection, vigilant monitoring, and expert clinical support.