Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Collective Induction: Twelve Postulates.

Laughlin1

  • 1University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
|October 6, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pigs shift too: foraging strategies and spatial memory in the domestic pig.

Animal behaviour·2000
Same author

Frames of Reference in Quantity Estimations by Groups and Individuals.

Organizational behavior and human decision processes·1999
Same author

Effectiveness of Positive Hypothesis Testing in Inductive and Deductive Rule Learning.

Organizational behavior and human decision processes·1999
Same author

Effects of carbon substrates on nitrite accumulation in freshwater sediments

Applied and environmental microbiology·1999
Same author

Effectiveness of Positive Hypothesis Testing for Cooperative Groups.

Organizational behavior and human decision processes·1998
Same author

Pigs in space: spatial memory and its susceptibility to interference.

Animal behaviour·1998
Same journal

Using Fresh Starts to Nudge Increased Retirement Savings.

Organizational behavior and human decision processes·2021
Same journal

Active choice, implicit defaults, and the incentive to choose.

Organizational behavior and human decision processes·2021
Same journal

Behavior Change.

Organizational behavior and human decision processes·2021
Same journal

Nudging: Progress to date and future directions.

Organizational behavior and human decision processes·2021
Same journal

Face threat sensitivity in distributive negotiations: Effects on negotiator self-esteem and demands.

Organizational behavior and human decision processes·2020
Same journal

<i>OBHDP</i> Editorial: Where we are, how we got here, and where we're going.

Organizational behavior and human decision processes·2020
See all related articles

This study explores collective induction, a group process for discovering scientific principles. It outlines 12 postulates on how groups collaboratively generate and test hypotheses, enhancing scientific discovery.

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Group Dynamics

Background:

  • Collective induction involves cooperative hypothesis generation and testing.
  • Understanding group decision-making processes is crucial for scientific advancement.
  • Existing research highlights the importance of social combination in group performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present 12 postulates on collective induction.
  • To situate collective induction within the social combination approach.
  • To review evidence supporting the postulates and explore group dynamics in hypothesis formation.

Main Methods:

  • Review and synthesis of existing research on collective induction.
  • Formulation of 12 postulates based on the social combination approach.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of factors influencing group hypothesis formation and testing.

    • Main Results:

    • Collective induction is framed within the social combination approach to group decision-making.
    • Formalization of social combination processes for group hypothesis formation.
    • Summary of research comparing collective and individual induction, hypothesis/evidence importance, and hypothesis testing effectiveness.

    Conclusions:

    • Collective induction is a vital group process for scientific discovery.
    • The social combination approach provides a robust framework for understanding collective induction.
    • Further research can refine our understanding of group dynamics in scientific reasoning.