Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 3, 2026
07:34
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
Choosing Work Group Members: Balancing Similarity, Competence, and Familiarity
1Stanford University
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
|March 9, 2000
Summary
People choose work partners based on shared race, competence, and past relationships. This preference for familiar attributes helps create predictable group dynamics.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Organizational Behavior
- Sociology
Background:
- Understanding group composition is crucial for team effectiveness.
- Individual attributes, relational factors, and network ties influence partner selection.
- Previous research has not fully integrated these determinants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the determinants of work partner choice.
- To explore the influence of individual, relational, and structural attributes on team formation.
- To understand the basis for selecting future group members.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a combined model integrating individual and relational attributes.
- Collected four years of data from 33 small project groups.
- Employed social network analysis to measure previous participant relationships.
Main Results:
- People exhibit in-group bias, preferring partners of the same race.
- Reputation for competence and hard work significantly influences partner choice.
- Strong past working relationships are a key factor in selecting future collaborators.
Conclusions:
- Work partner selection is driven by a desire for predictability.
- Homophily (similarity) and established ties play a significant role in team composition.
- Findings highlight the importance of considering social and relational factors in organizational settings.
Related Concept Videos
02:12Relationship Formation
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
01:31In- and Out-Groups
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
02:16Stereotype Content Model
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...
01:37Social Loafing
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...
01:23Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity
The similarity hypothesis suggests that individuals are more likely to form relationships with others who share similar attitudes, beliefs, values, and interests. This concept has been widely studied in social psychology, demonstrating that perceived similarity fosters interpersonal attraction. In an experiment supporting this hypothesis, participants were presented with fabricated information indicating that strangers held attitudes similar to their own. The results showed that participants...
01:26Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...