Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computerized test development software. A comparative review updated.

J M Kirkpatrick1, D M Billings, K Hodson-Carlton

  • 1Purdue University School of Nursing, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-1337, USA. jmkirk@purdue.edu

Computers in Nursing
|March 31, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Baseline Neurocognitive Functioning in Children/Teenagers and Young Adults Treated for Central Nervous System Malignancies Prior to Proton Therapy.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2026
Same author

Production performance, nutrient digestibility, and enteric methane emissions of lactating Holstein cows fed triticale silage of different maturities in different dietary forage inclusions.

Journal of dairy science·2026
Same author

Copenhagen Prospective Personalized Oncology (CoPPO)-impact of comprehensive genomic profiling in more than 2000 patients in a phase I setting.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2025
Same author

Canadian Surgery Forum: Abstracts of presentations to the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Association of Bariatric Physicians and Surgeons, Canadian Association of General Surgeons, Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons, Canadian Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, Canadian Society of Surgical Oncology, Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Vancouver, BC, Sept. 17-21, 2013.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2025
Same author

Multi-temporal assessment of a wildfire chronosequence by remote sensing.

MethodsX·2024
Same author

Head and neck myofibroma: A case series of 16 cases and literature review.

Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal·2024
Same journal

Medi-Sim Multimedia: AACN Critical Care-Hematological System.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

Managing Information in Healthcare: Concepts and Cases.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

Using online learning in a traditional face-to-face environment.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

The "big bang" implementation: not for the faint of heart.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

Homebound older adults' experiences with the Internet and e-mail.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

A study of factors related to the use of online resources by nurse educators.

Computers in nursing·2002
See all related articles

This review compares nine test development software programs for nurse educators. It highlights key considerations like security and pedagogical use to aid in selecting the best fit for educational settings.

Area of Science:

  • Educational Technology
  • Nursing Education

Background:

  • Effective test development and administration are crucial in nursing education.
  • Numerous software solutions exist, but their suitability varies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comparatively review nine commercially available test development software programs.
  • To inform nurse educators on selecting appropriate software for their needs.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative review of nine software packages: A+ Test Manager and Test Taker, CATSoftware, Diploma 97, Examaker for Windows, FastTEST, Microtest Pro, Pedagogue, Question Mark, and Test Construction Set.
  • Analysis of software features related to security, pedagogical applications, test design, and administration.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Software programs differ significantly in features and capabilities.
  • Key issues such as test security, pedagogical integration, and ease of administration were evaluated across the reviewed software.

    • Conclusions:

    • Nurse educators must carefully evaluate their specific educational context and requirements.
    • Selecting the right test development software is essential for efficient and secure assessment in nursing programs.