Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating nursing administration instruments.

D L Huber1, M Maas, J McCloskey

  • 1College of Nursing, University of Iowa, USA.

The Journal of Nursing Administration
|May 24, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Value based healthcare estimation values for benchmarking among Spanish Hospitals for four health problems.

Journal of healthcare quality research·2026
Same author

Australian guidelines for anal cancer screening using anal human papillomavirus testing with cytology triage in people living with HIV.

HIV medicine·2025
Same author

Evaluation of milking performance following 2 different teat-preparation routines.

Journal of dairy science·2025
Same author

Time-resolved diamond magnetic microscopy of superparamagnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles.

ArXiv·2024
Same author

Decoding patient-reported measures (PRMs) use in clinical practice: How and for what? The MATRICS framework.

Journal of healthcare quality research·2024
Same author

From the clinic to the wards, the evolution of penicillin allergy testing by non-allergists in a UK hospital.

The Journal of hospital infection·2024
Same journal

The CNO-CFO Dyad: A Strategic Driver of Organizational Performance.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

Elements of Effective Professional Governance: An Integrative Review.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

New Nurse Well-Being: Implications for Retention, Job Satisfaction, and Patient Safety.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

Virtual Nursing Programs in Acute Care Settings: A Scoping Review of Patient, Nurse, and System-Level Outcomes.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

Occupational Fatigue and Cognitive Performance Among Front-Line Nurse Leaders: The Interplay of Personal and Work Factors.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Resilience and Well-Being Among Nurse Leaders: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mindfulness and Narrative Interventions.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
See all related articles

This study identifies reliable and user-friendly measurement tools for assessing management innovations in nursing, covering autonomy, conflict, job satisfaction, leadership, and organizational climate.

Area of Science:

  • Nursing Administration
  • Organizational Behavior
  • Healthcare Management

Background:

  • Management innovations impact healthcare delivery and evidence diffusion.
  • Nurses require research-based guidance to select appropriate outcome measurement instruments.
  • Psychometrically sound and user-friendly tools are essential for evaluating contextual variables in practice and research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and evaluate existing measures for assessing management innovations.
  • Focus on five key areas: autonomy, conflict, job satisfaction, leadership, and organizational climate.
  • Provide guidance for selecting instruments for practice and research.

Main Methods:

  • Expert focus group consensus methodology.
  • Evaluation of available instruments for psychometric soundness and ease of use.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Systematic review of measurement tools in specified areas.

    • Main Results:

    • A curated portfolio of validated measurement instruments was developed.
    • Instruments are clustered by concept and presented in a spreadsheet format.
    • Includes expert consensus judgments and descriptive information for each measure.

    Conclusions:

    • Identified psychometrically sound and user-friendly instruments for measuring key variables.
    • The portfolio serves as a resource to expedite instrument selection.
    • Aids in choosing the optimal instrument for evaluating clinical or management intervention outcomes.