Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

View box luminance measurements and their effect on reader performance.

L N Rill1, W Huda, N A Gkanatsios

  • 1Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610-0374, USA.

Academic Radiology
|July 14, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chlorhexidine anaphylaxis: implications for post-resuscitation management.

Anaesthesia·2016
Same author

Review of portable CT with assessment of a dedicated head CT scanner.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2009
Same author

Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.

Physics in medicine and biology·2008
Same author

Comments on 'Increasing film-focus distance (FFD) reduces radiation dose for X-ray examinations' by P.C. Brennan, S. McDonnell and D. O'Leary.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2005
Same author

Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.

Pediatric radiology·2004
Same author

Acute transient sialodenopathy after the use of PAXpress.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2002
Same journal

Improving Reliability of MRI Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Assessment Across Radiology and Spine Specialties: Impact of a Structured Education Intervention.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Advances in CT and MRI for Yttrium-90 Radioembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Homogeneity of Liver Fat Distribution Serves as a Diagnostic Marker for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

MRI-based Predictors and Risk Constellations of Chronic Ankle Instability After Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain: A Multicenter Study.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Early Prediction of Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer using a Longitudinal US-based Stack-model.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Evaluating the Impact of Embolization on Outcomes in Iliopsoas Hematomas: A Multicenter Retrospective Propensity-matched Study.

Academic radiology·2026
See all related articles

View box luminance has minimal impact on detecting low-contrast details in mammography. However, performance significantly declines with increased room light and without image masking, especially for smaller details.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Human Factors in Medicine

Background:

  • Mammography is crucial for early cancer detection.
  • Accurate interpretation relies on visualizing subtle, low-contrast lesions.
  • Optimizing viewing conditions is essential for diagnostic performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the influence of view box luminance on low-contrast detection.
  • To evaluate the impact of ambient room lighting and image masking on radiologist performance.

Main Methods:

  • 632 view boxes with luminance from 860 to 3,300 nit were evaluated.
  • Twelve radiologists assessed low-contrast detail visibility on mammographic phantoms.
  • Room illuminance and image masking effects were analyzed.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Low-contrast visibility was largely unaffected by view box luminance.
  • Performance degraded significantly with increased room illuminance and removed masking.
  • Smallest details and highest film densities showed the greatest performance decline.

Conclusions:

  • View box luminance is not a critical factor for low-contrast detection.
  • Stray light and higher room illuminance impair diagnostic accuracy.
  • Optimizing viewing environments is key to improving mammographic interpretation.