Related Experiment Videos
Functioning at the clinical-research interface: the clinical-research meeting
The American Journal of Psychiatry
|September 1, 1975
Summary
A clinical-research meeting involving staff and psychotic patients effectively resolved issues in therapeutic settings. This collaboration improved research implementation and patient care by addressing challenges at the clinical-research interface.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychobiology
Background:
- Conducting clinical and psychobiological research within therapeutic settings presents unique challenges.
- Integrating research responsibilities with clinical care requires careful management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the experience of conducting clinical and psychobiological research in a therapeutic milieu.
- To highlight the utility of a clinical-research meeting in addressing interface challenges.
- To identify and discuss covert issues that can impede research and patient care.
Main Methods:
- Establishment of a clinical-research meeting.
- Inclusion of clinical-care staff, researchers, and acutely psychotic patients.
- Discussion of specific challenges encountered at the clinical-research interface.
Main Results:
- The clinical-research meeting served as an effective mechanism for problem identification and resolution.
- Enhanced effectiveness in research implementation and patient care was observed.
- Covert issues, including abrogation of responsibilities and intergroup competition, were identified as potential threats.
Conclusions:
- A collaborative clinical-research meeting is a valuable tool for managing complex therapeutic research environments.
- Proactive identification and resolution of issues are crucial for successful research and optimal patient outcomes.
- Addressing intergroup dynamics and responsibility issues is essential for maintaining unit function.