Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Long-term outcomes with mechanical and tissue valves.

¹Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.

The Journal of Heart Valve Disease

|February 15, 2002

Summary

Mechanical heart valves show lower failure rates and better survival than tissue valves, especially for aortic valve replacement. Age recommendations favor mechanical valves for specific patient groups, aligning with current guidelines.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Depression, healing, and recovery from coronary artery bypass surgery.

American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses·2005

Same author

Effects of a home walking exercise program on functional status and symptoms in heart failure.

American heart journal·2004

Same author

Hormone replacement therapy is associated with improved survival in women with advanced heart failure.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2003

Same author

Cardiovascular disease outcomes during 6.8 years of hormone therapy: Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study follow-up (HERS II).

JAMA·2002

Area of Science:

Cardiology
Biomedical Engineering
Clinical Outcomes Research

Background:

Heart valve replacement is a common procedure.
Selection between mechanical and tissue heart valve prostheses is critical.
Comparative outcome data guides clinical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare outcomes between mechanical and tissue heart valve prostheses.
To inform optimal heart valve selection based on patient characteristics and valve type.

Main Methods:

Review of recent publications comparing patient outcomes.
Analysis of randomized and retrospective studies.
Evaluation of thromboembolism, hemorrhage, and survival rates.

Main Results:

Similar thromboembolism rates for mechanical and tissue valves.
Higher hemorrhage rates for aortic mechanical valves, but not for mitral mechanical valves.
Significantly higher valve failure rates for tissue valves across all positions.
Improved overall survival with aortic mechanical valves compared to tissue valves.
Age-based recommendations: mechanical valves for aortic <65 and mitral <70 years.

Conclusions:

Mechanical valves demonstrate superior durability and survival, particularly in the aorta.
Tissue valves exhibit higher failure rates, irrespective of position.
Current ACC/AHA guidelines align with age-specific recommendations for mechanical valve use.

Related Experiment Videos