Related Experiment Videos
Accuracy of the 1990 census and undercount adjustments.
Journal of the American Statistical Association
|September 1, 1993
Summary
The U.S. Census Bureau recommended adjusting the 1990 census for undercount, but the Secretary of Commerce decided against it. This decision was based on analyses of census accuracy and proposed adjustments using the Post-Enumeration Survey (PES).
Area of Science:
- Demographics
- Statistical Analysis
- Government Policy
Background:
- The U.S. Census Bureau conducted a Post-Enumeration Survey (PES) to assess the accuracy of the 1990 census.
- The Bureau recommended adjusting the 1990 census data to correct for an estimated undercount.
- The Secretary of Commerce ultimately decided against implementing the recommended adjustment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the Census Bureau's total error and loss function analyses.
- To identify and discuss the criteria used by the Department of Commerce in deciding not to adjust the census.
- To compare the Department of Commerce's decision criteria with aggregate loss functions.
Main Methods:
- Review of Census Bureau analyses regarding census accuracy and PES-based undercount adjustments.
- Examination of total error analysis and loss function analysis methodologies.
- Identification and discussion of the specific criteria influencing the Department of Commerce's final decision.
Main Results:
- The Census Bureau's analyses indicated a need for census adjustment due to undercount.
- The Department of Commerce's decision not to adjust relied on criteria distinct from standard aggregate loss functions.
- The specific criteria used by the Department of Commerce are detailed and evaluated.
Conclusions:
- The decision-making process for census adjustment involves complex analyses and specific policy criteria.
- Understanding the criteria beyond statistical loss functions is crucial for interpreting census accuracy decisions.
- Further examination of the criteria used in the 1990 census adjustment decision provides insights into statistical policy.