Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Microbeams, microdosimetry and specific dose.

G Randers-Pehrson1

  • 1Columbia University, RARAF, PO Box 21, Irvington, NY 10533, USA. gerhard@r-p.net

Radiation Protection Dosimetry
|August 27, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Horizontal Multi-Purpose Microbeam System.

Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment·2018
Same author

A Mouse Ear Model for Bystander Studies Induced by Microbeam Irradiation.

Radiation research·2015
Same author

Construction of mouse phantoms from segmented CT scan data for radiation dosimetry studies.

Physics in medicine and biology·2015
Same author

Integrated interdisciplinary training in the radiological sciences.

The British journal of radiology·2013
Same author

Ion, X-ray, UV and Neutron Microbeam Systems for Cell Irradiation.

AIP conference proceedings·2013
Same author

Design of a novel flow-and-shoot microbeam.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2010
Same journal

Development of CaSO4: Dy-based ring badge for extremity dose monitoring of radiation workers in India.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

A proposal for a differentiated radiation protection program for the decommissioning of nuclear power plants compared to the operation of nuclear power plants.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

A three-dimensional neutron localization method based on double-scattering imaging and reconstruction algorithm.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

Effect of 131I biodistribution on measurements using a scanning whole-body counter.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

Activity concentration of 137Cs and natural radionuclides in soil around the Belarusian nuclear power plant in the pre-commissioning period.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

Novel passive-adaptive exoskeleton-supported radiation protection equipment with enhanced shielding and reduced perceived weight.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
See all related articles

Radiation dose is a standard measure, but breaks down for microbeam irradiations. A new term, "specific dose," is proposed to better quantify energy deposition in targeted cellular volumes.

Area of Science:

  • Radiation dosimetry
  • Microdosimetry
  • Radiobiology

Background:

  • The concept of radiation dose is well-established but has limitations.
  • These limitations become apparent in microdosimetry and microbeam irradiations.
  • Non-uniform energy deposition at the cellular level challenges traditional dose metrics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the limitations of conventional dose metrics in microdosimetry.
  • To introduce a new, more precise quantity for describing radiation energy deposition.
  • To propose a renaming of Booz's 'mean specific energy in affected volumes' to 'specific dose'.

Main Methods:

  • Reviewing the breakdown of dose concepts in specific radiation scenarios.
  • Analyzing the definition and implications of 'mean specific energy in affected volumes'.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Proposing the term 'specific dose' defined as mean energy deposited per unit mass in a specified volume.
  • Main Results:

    • The conventional dose concept is inadequate for microbeam irradiations with non-uniform energy deposition.
    • Booz's quantity, 'mean specific energy in affected volumes,' offers a potential solution.
    • The proposed 'specific dose' provides a quantifiable measure for targeted energy deposition, e.g., 'nuclear specific dose'.

    Conclusions:

    • 'Specific dose' is a more appropriate term for quantifying energy deposition in targeted volumes.
    • This new metric can accurately describe radiation effects in scenarios like microbeam experiments.
    • The 'specific dose' concept enhances precision in radiobiological studies and radiation protection.