Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mortality risk perceptions: a Bayesian reassessment.

J K Hakes, W K Viscusi

    Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
    |September 27, 2002
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Gambling problems in treatment for affective disorders: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC).

    Journal of affective disorders·2016
    Same author

    Synthetic risks, risk potency, and carcinogen regulation.

    Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management]·2000
    Same author

    Stringency of workplace air contaminant exposure limits: a case study of OSHA risk management.

    Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2000
    Same author

    Constructive cigarette regulation.

    Duke law journal·1999
    Same author

    Alternative approaches to valuing intangible health losses: the evidence for multiple sclerosis.

    Journal of health economics·1998
    Same author

    Asymmetric assessments in valuing pharmaceutical risks.

    Medical care·1996
    Same journal

    Adapting temporal preference to scarcity: A role for emotion?

    Journal of risk and uncertainty·2025
    Same journal

    Grit, discounting, & time inconsistency.

    Journal of risk and uncertainty·2025
    Same journal

    Monetary values of increasing life expectancy: Sensitivity to shifts of the survival curve.

    Journal of risk and uncertainty·2023
    Same journal

    On the role of monetary incentives in risk preference elicitation experiments.

    Journal of risk and uncertainty·2023
    Same journal

    Risky choice: Probability weighting explains independence axiom violations in monkeys.

    Journal of risk and uncertainty·2023
    Same journal

    Seen and not seen: How people judge ambiguous behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Journal of risk and uncertainty·2022
    See all related articles

    Understanding risk perception is key. This study shows that individual and population death rates, along with life years lost, influence how people perceive mortality risks, especially for larger risks.

    Area of Science:

    • Decision Sciences
    • Risk Analysis
    • Behavioral Economics

    Background:

    • Accurate risk perception is crucial for public health and policy.
    • Existing models often simplify the complex factors influencing how individuals assess mortality risks.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To test Bayesian models explaining factors influencing risk beliefs.
    • To identify key determinants of perceived mortality risks.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized data on perceived and actual mortality risks.
    • Applied and compared several alternative Bayesian models.
    • Analyzed the influence of hazard rates, population death rates, and life years lost.

    Main Results:

    • Individual hazard rates significantly influence risk beliefs.
    Keywords:
    BehaviorBeliefs--determinantsBiologyCauses Of DeathCultureDeath RateDemographic FactorsEvaluationModels, TheoreticalMortalityPerception--determinantsPopulationPopulation DynamicsPremature MortalityPsychological FactorsResearch MethodologyRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsWorld

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Population death rates and discounted life years lost also impact risk perception.
  • Model accuracy for linear perception increases with risk level, performing poorly for small risks.

    • Conclusions:

    • Risk perception is shaped by a combination of individual, societal, and temporal factors.
    • Bayesian modeling provides a robust framework for understanding risk beliefs.
    • The accuracy of risk perception models is contingent on the magnitude of the risk.