Related Experiment Videos
When fit indices and residuals are incompatible
Michael W Browne1, Robert C MacCallum, Cheong-Tag Kim
1Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210-1222, USA. browne.4@osu.edu
Psychological Methods
|January 18, 2003
Summary
Standard chi-square fit indices are sensitive to small unique variances, potentially indicating poor model fit despite small residuals. This study explains this phenomenon and provides examples.
Area of Science:
- Statistics
- Psychometrics
- Quantitative Psychology
Background:
- Chi-square-based fit indices are standard in factor analysis.
- These indices assess model fit by comparing observed and model-implied covariance matrices.
- A known issue is their sensitivity to sample size.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate a lesser-known property of chi-square fit indices related to unique variances.
- To explain why fit indices may contradict correlation residuals.
- To provide empirical and artificial examples illustrating this incompatibility.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of standard chi-square-based fit indices in factor analysis.
- Examination of the relationship between unique variances and model fit.
- Generation of empirical and artificial datasets for comparison.
Main Results:
- Chi-square fit indices are more sensitive to misfit with small unique variances.
- Excellent model fit indicated by small residuals can be contradicted by poor fit indices when unique variances are small.
- Artificial data with larger unique variances showed excellent fit indices with identical residuals.
Conclusions:
- The sensitivity of fit indices to unique variances is a critical consideration in model evaluation.
- Researchers should be aware of potential discrepancies between residuals and fit indices.
- Understanding the role of unique variances enhances the interpretation of factor analysis model fit.