Related Experiment Videos
Power moves: complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior.
Larissa Z Tiedens1, Alison R Fragale
1Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, California 94305-5015, USA. ltiedens@stanford.edu
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|March 15, 2003
Summary
Nonverbal behaviors often complement, rather than mimic, social dynamics. Complementary dominant and submissive postures enhance liking and comfort, suggesting a natural tendency towards hierarchical differentiation in social interactions.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Nonverbal Communication
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Social interactions involve complex nonverbal cues.
- Dominance and submissive behaviors are key components of social hierarchies.
- The interplay between dominant and submissive nonverbal behaviors is not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether nonverbal behaviors exhibit complementarity or mimicry.
- To determine the impact of complementary versus mimicry on interpersonal liking and comfort.
- To explore the role of nonverbal behavior in establishing social hierarchies.
Main Methods:
- Two studies were conducted involving participant interactions with confederates.
- Confederates displayed either dominant (postural expansion) or submissive (postural constriction) behaviors.
- Participant postural responses and self-reported liking and comfort were measured.
Main Results:
- Participants' postural stances adapted to complement the confederate's behavior (e.g., decreased stance to dominance, increased stance to submission).
- Complementary nonverbal behaviors led to significantly higher liking and comfort compared to mimicry.
- The second study confirmed that complementarity, not mimicry, fosters positive interpersonal evaluations.
Conclusions:
- Nonverbal behaviors tend to complement each other, reflecting and reinforcing social dynamics.
- Complementarity in nonverbal behavior is crucial for positive social interactions and relationship building.
- These findings support the theory of hierarchical differentiation in social interactions.