Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Evidence for the coincidence effect in environmental judgments: why isn't it easy to correctly identify
Carmen Tanner1, Niels Jungbluth
1Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, 2029 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208-2710, USA. c-tanner@northwestern.edu
Abstract:
The coincidence effect--a phenomenon known in similarity research--suggests that people assign extra weight to features that 2 items have in common. The role of this effect in 2 kinds of environmental judgments about food products is investigated. Task 1 ("How environmentally friendly is a particular food product compared with a reference?") provided some evidence for the coincidence hypothesis. However, Task 2 ("How much more or less environmentally harmful is a food product compared with a standard?") showed anticoincidence. People's subjective evaluations were examined in regard to how they matched or deviated from objective measures of harmful environmental consequences related to food products. Coincidence and anticoincidence help to explain when and why subjective and objective evaluations may diverge.
Related Concept Videos
Cause and Effect
Confirmation Biases
The Availability Heuristic
Naturalistic Observations
The Representativeness Heuristic
What is Natural Selection?

