Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026
Measurement of Tissue Non-Heme Iron Content using a Bathophenanthroline-Based Colorimetric Assay
Published on: January 31, 2022
Comparison of response between food supplemented with powdered iron and iron in syrup form for iron deficiency anemia
Parvez Ahmed1, Asad Mahmood, Shahid Aziz
1Department of Hematology, Armed Forces Bone Marrow Transplant Centre, Rawalpindi. parvez101@yahoo.com
Insights
Iron powder supplementation is a well-tolerated and cost-effective alternative to iron syrup for treating iron deficiency anemia in young children. This study found comparable treatment responses between the two forms, with powder showing better gastrointestinal tolerance.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Hematology
- Nutritional Anemia Management
Background:
- Iron deficiency anemia is a prevalent nutritional disorder in children aged 1-5 years.
- Effective supplementation strategies are crucial for managing this condition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and tolerance of powdered versus syrup iron formulations for treating iron deficiency anemia in children.
- To evaluate treatment response based on hemoglobin and serum ferritin levels.
Main Methods:
- A quasi-experimental study involving 200 children aged 1-5 years diagnosed with iron deficiency anemia.
- Participants received either iron in syrup (Group A) or powdered iron (Group B) for six weeks.
- Treatment response was assessed via hemoglobin, reticulocyte count, and serum ferritin levels at various intervals.
Main Results:
- Powdered iron showed better gastrointestinal tolerance compared to syrup.
- Both formulations led to a significant increase in serum ferritin levels.
- While powdered iron showed a slightly greater mean hemoglobin rise (1.9 g/dl vs. 1.6 g/dl), the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).
Conclusions:
- Powdered iron is a cost-effective and better-tolerated alternative for iron supplementation in children.
- This formulation can be considered a viable option for managing iron deficiency anemia in pediatric populations.
Objective:
To evaluate and compare the response between food supplemented with iron in powdered and iron in syrup forms for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in children aged 1-5 years.
Design:
Quasi-experimental study.
Place And Duration Of Study:
This study was conducted at Combined Military Hospital, Multan, from January 2000 to December 2000.
Patients And Methods:
Consecutive 200 cases of iron deficiency anemia, aged 1-5 years, were included in the study. Diagnosis was based on history, physical examination, complete blood counts (CBC) and serum ferritin levels. The patients were randomized to receive either iron in syrup form (Group A) or equivalent doses of iron powder sprinkled over food (Group B). The patients were followed up with hemoglobin estimation (Hb) and reticulocyte response at 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 6 weeks. CBC and serum ferritin were repeated at 6 weeks.
Results:
Over half (51%) of the patients were between 1-2 years of age. One hundred thirty-two were males and 68 females. Most of the patients belonged to poor socioeconomic class. The iron in powder form was better tolerated than iron syrup as this group witnessed fewer episodes of gastrointestinal disturbances. The rise in mean Hb level after 6 weeks of treatment in group A and B was 1.6 g/dl and 1.9 g/dl respectively. Hemoglobin rise in group B was more than group A but this was statistically non-significant (p > 0.05). There was small but significant (p < 0.05) rise in serum ferritin in both the groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups for response to the two forms of iron administration.
Conclusion:
The powdered form of iron is a cost-effective and better tolerated method of iron administration in children and can be considered as an alternate option for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in children.
