Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression.

Razia Azen1, David V Budescu

  • 1Department of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 53201, USA. azen@uwm.edu

Psychological Methods
|August 20, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

School Based Mental Health: The Structure of the Partnership Matters.

Community mental health journal·2025
Same author

In-field temporospatial gait retraining adherence improves with music auditory cueing.

Journal of sports sciences·2025
Same author

Running Step Rate Can Be Increased With Both Metronome and Music Auditory Cueing.

Journal of sport rehabilitation·2025
Same author

Robotization of Industrial Processes: Motivational Differences between Companies with and without Existing Robotic Processes.

IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors·2023
Same author

The wisdom of many in few: Finding individuals who are as wise as the crowd.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2023
Same author

To deliberate or not? The role of intuition and deliberation when controlling for irrelevant information in selection decisions.

Cognition·2022

This study refines dominance analysis for comparing predictor importance in multiple regression. New quantitative measures and bootstrap stability assessment offer deeper insights into predictor patterns.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Quantitative Psychology
  • Econometrics

Background:

  • Determining the relative importance of predictors in multiple regression is crucial for understanding complex relationships.
  • Existing methods like dominance analysis provide a framework but can be limited in scope and interpretation.
  • The need for robust and nuanced methods to assess predictor importance is a persistent challenge in statistical modeling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To refine and extend dominance analysis for a more comprehensive comparison of predictor importance in multiple regression.
  • To introduce novel quantitative dominance measures with varying strictness levels for flexible application.
  • To assess the stability and reliability of dominance results using bootstrap resampling techniques.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The study builds upon dominance analysis by examining R-squared values across all possible subset models.
  • Several new quantitative dominance measures are introduced, differing in their definitional strictness.
  • The bootstrap method is employed to evaluate the stability of dominance results under repeated sampling.

Main Results:

  • The proposed quantitative dominance measures are intuitive, meaningful, and informative for predictor importance assessment.
  • These refined methods provide deeper insights into the patterns of predictor importance than previously available.
  • Bootstrap analysis demonstrates the stability of the dominance results, enhancing their reliability.

Conclusions:

  • The enhanced dominance analysis offers a powerful and versatile tool for researchers investigating predictor importance.
  • The quantitative measures and stability assessment facilitate a more thorough understanding of predictor contributions in regression models.
  • This approach addresses various research questions related to predictor hierarchy and influence.