Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bob's meltdown.

Nicholas G Carr

    Harvard Business Review
    |September 11, 2003
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    A conflict arises between a new Senior VP for Knowledge Management and a top-performing General Manager. This case study explores how a CEO should handle the fallout from an employee outburst and manage competing departmental needs.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    IT doesn't matter.

    Harvard business review·2003
    Same journal

    The Case for Capitation.

    Harvard business review·2016
    Same journal

    How to Pay for Health Care.

    Harvard business review·2016
    Same journal

    How to Preempt Team Conflict.

    Harvard business review·2016
    Same journal

    The Secrets of Great Teamwork.

    Harvard business review·2016
    Same journal

    Leading the Team You Inherit.

    Harvard business review·2016
    Same journal

    Wicked Problem Solvers.

    Harvard business review·2016
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Organizational Behavior
    • Knowledge Management
    • Human Resources Management

    Background:

    • A new Senior Vice President (VP) for Knowledge Management (KM) proposes establishing a cross-functional KM committee.
    • A General Manager (GM) reacts aggressively to the KM proposal, citing pressure from shrinking budgets and revenue targets.
    • The CEO faces a dilemma between supporting a new initiative and retaining a high-performing, yet disruptive, manager.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze a workplace conflict stemming from a KM initiative clashing with operational demands.
    • To explore the challenges of implementing progressive management strategies in traditional organizations.
    • To provide guidance for leadership on resolving interpersonal disputes and balancing strategic goals with employee performance.

    Main Methods:

    • Presents a fictional case study detailing a workplace conflict between key personnel.
    • Includes perspectives from various stakeholders: the KM VP, the GM, an HR Director, and the CEO.
    • Offers commentary from four fictional experts on how the CEO should address the situation.

    Main Results:

    • The conflict highlights the tension between implementing new knowledge management systems and meeting immediate revenue goals.
    • Bob Dunn's outburst is seen as unprofessional by HR, while Annette Innella's initiative is viewed as potentially disruptive to current operations.
    • CEO Jay Nguyen must decide whether to reprimand Bob Dunn, potentially losing a key revenue generator, or curb Annette Innella's initiative, hindering KM progress.

    Conclusions:

    • Effective leadership requires navigating complex interpersonal dynamics and strategic priorities.
    • Resolving such conflicts necessitates balancing the needs of individuals, departments, and the overall organization.
    • The case underscores the importance of change management and clear communication during the implementation of new business strategies.