Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The mirror effect and the spacing effect.

Bennet Murdock1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. murdock@psych.utoronto.ca

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|November 19, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Terrace simultaneous chaining paradigm.

Behavioural processes·2010
Same author

Issues with the SIMPLE model: comment on Brown, Neath, and Chater (2007).

Psychological review·2008
Same author

Decision-making models of remember-know judgments: comment on Rotello, Macmillan, and Reeder (2004).

Psychological review·2006
Same author

The recall of missing items.

Memory & cognition·2005
Same author

Storage and retrieval of serial-order information.

Memory (Hove, England)·2005
Same author

Item and associative recognition with precuing and postcuing.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2003
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

A new computational model explains memory effects like the mirror effect and spacing effect. It shows how word frequency and presentation intervals influence recognition accuracy by simulating excitation and inhibition processes.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • The mirror effect demonstrates differential error rates for rare versus common words.
  • The spacing effect shows recognition accuracy improves with longer intervals between item presentations.
  • Both effects challenge traditional memory strength theories and global-matching models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a computational strength-based model (EICL) explaining the mirror and spacing effects.
  • To integrate excitation, inhibition, and a closed-loop learning algorithm within a unified framework.
  • To test the model's ability to simulate empirical findings in memory research.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a computational model (EICL) using three nonlinear coupled stochastic difference equations for excitation, inhibition, and context.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Defined memory strength as the algebraic sum of excitation, inhibition, and context (s = x - y + z).
  • Created a simulated lexicon for experimental manipulations and model testing.

    • Main Results:

    • The EICL model successfully simulated mirror effect inequalities related to word frequency.
    • The model also accurately predicted the spacing effect for single-item recognition.
    • Crucially, the same parameter values were used for both effects, indicating a unified mechanism.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed EICL model provides a viable computational explanation for both the mirror and spacing effects.
    • The model's success suggests that excitation, inhibition, and context dynamics are key to understanding these memory phenomena.
    • This work highlights the potential of strength-based computational models in cognitive psychology.