Related Experiment Videos
Analysing interpretation and reinterpreting analysis: exploring the logic of critical reflection
1Institute of Health and Community Studies, Bournemouth University, Royal London House, Bournemouth, Dorset, UK. dfreshwater@bournemouth.ac.uk
Summary
This study explores qualitative data analysis, proposing a cycle of reductive, inductive, and hypothetico-deductive testing. It argues for a pragmatic coherence view of knowledge, emphasizing dialogue and transparency in interpretation.
Area of Science:
- Qualitative Research Methods
- Epistemology
- Reflective Practice
Background:
- Distinction between analysis and interpretation in qualitative research.
- Importance of critical analysis in reflective practice.
- Need for a robust framework for knowledge construction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the distinction between analysis and interpretation in qualitative research.
- To propose a logical cycle for critical analysis and reflective practice.
- To advocate for a pragmatic, coherence-based view of knowledge.
Main Methods:
- Review of logical processes in analysis and interpretation.
- Proposal of a cycle involving reductive, inductive, and hypothetico-deductive testing.
- Emphasis on dialogue with texts, evidence, and beliefs.
Main Results:
- Analysis and interpretation are complementary logical processes.
- A cycle of reductive, inductive, and hypothetico-deductive testing is proposed.
- Knowledge justification should be based on coherence, not correspondence to reality.
Conclusions:
- The goal of qualitative data analysis is not to mirror reality but to achieve coherence.
- Evidence and belief are intrinsically linked in knowledge construction.
- Transparent use of logical processes is crucial for establishing interpretive credibility.