Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Biomaterials in total joint replacement.

Kalpana S Katti1

  • 1Department of Civil Engineering, North Dakota State University, CIE 201B, Fargo, ND 58105, USA. Kalpana.katti@ndsu.nodak.edu

Colloids and Surfaces. B, Biointerfaces
|November 24, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Circulating Horizontal Flow Bioreactor Using Tissue Engineering Scaffolds for Evaluating Prostate Cancer Metastasis to Bone.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials·2026
Same author

Plant Extracts from <i>Origanum vulgare</i> and <i>Vaccinium macrocarpon</i> Induce Apoptosis of Bone Metastasized Breast Cancer Cells in a 3D Bone-Mimetic Testbed of Bone Metastasis.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Threshold Optimization of In Situ HAPnanoclay in Polymeric Scaffolds to Enhance Biomechanical Response.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A·2026
Same author

A Novel Biomimetic Vascularized 3D Reinforced Nanocomposite Scaffold for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair.

Advanced healthcare materials·2026
Same author

Patient-Derived Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis <i>In Vitro</i> Model Using Bone-Mimetic Nanoclay Scaffolds.

Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine·2025
Same author

Evaluating Breast Cancer Patient-Specific Metastasis Severity at Bone Site Using <i>In Vitro</i> Models.

ACS biomaterials science & engineering·2025
Same journal

Adaptive and intelligent scaffolds: Transforming tissue engineering through material and structural innovations.

Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces·2026
Same journal

Safeguarding nanovesicles and their payload: A framework for stable storage.

Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces·2026
Same journal

Drug-loaded nanomicelles with ROS-responsive controlled release of carnosic acid for the treatment of ulcerative colitis.

Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces·2026
Same journal

Manganese‑containing mesoporous bioactive glass with antioxidative and osteogenic activities for periodontitis treatment.

Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces·2026
Same journal

Biomimetic PRMT1 inhibitor-loaded manganese-containing bimetallic MOF enhances NSCLC immunotherapy via cGAS-STING activation and PD-L1 blockade.

Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces·2026
Same journal

Interfacial engineering in lipase-catalyzed synthesis of functional lipids: Mechanisms, strategies, and prospects.

Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces·2026
See all related articles

This paper reviews materials for total hip replacement, including metals, polymers, ceramics, and composites. It evaluates their pros and cons for hip implants and discusses future research directions for advanced materials.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Orthopedic Engineering
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Total hip replacement (THR) relies on diverse material systems for implant components.
  • Metals, polymers, ceramics, and composites are commonly employed in THR implants.
  • Understanding material properties is crucial for successful joint replacement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present an overview of current materials used in total hip replacement.
  • To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of various material systems.
  • To discuss emerging materials and future research needs in THR.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of materials systems in total hip replacement.
  • Analysis of mechanical properties relevant to hip implants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of current research in advanced composites for bone replacement.

    • Main Results:

    • Metals, polymers, ceramics, and composites each have distinct merits and demerits for THR.
    • Mechanical properties are critical for selecting suitable materials for hip implants.
    • Advanced polymeric nanocomposites and biomimetic composites show promise for future applications.

    Conclusions:

    • Current materials for THR have limitations that necessitate further research.
    • Advanced composite materials offer potential for improved hip implant performance.
    • Significant challenges remain in translating novel materials into clinical practice.