Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Changing attitudes to 'the change'.

Katrina Allen1, Peter Mansfield

  • 1katrina.allen@health.sa.gov.au

Australian Family Physician
|December 9, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Doctors use decision-making shortcuts, but these can mislead. Reflecting on these heuristics, like those in hormone therapy (HT) for menopause, is crucial to avoid medical errors and ensure patient safety.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neonatal Vitamin D and Associations with Longitudinal Changes of Eczema up to 25 Years of Age.

Nutrients·2024
Same author

Gut microbiota composition during infancy and subsequent behavioural outcomes.

EBioMedicine·2020
Same author

Age at introduction to complementary solid food and food allergy and sensitization: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology·2019
Same author

The Role of Early Life Food Sensitization in Adolescent Lung Function: Results from 2 Birth Cohort Studies.

The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice·2019
Same author

Epigenetic dysregulation of naive CD4+ T-cell activation genes in childhood food allergy.

Nature communications·2018
Same author

Preliminary Development of the Food Allergy Coping and Emotions Questionnaires for Children, Adolescents, and Young People: Qualitative Analysis of Data on IgE-Mediated Food Allergy from Five Countries.

The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice·2018
Same journal

Occupational violence and staff safety in general practice.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

You should get that mole checked out: Ethical and legal considerations of the unsolicited clinical opinion.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

Understanding the decision to commence a dose administration aid.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

Psychological distress and risky sexual behaviours among women aged 16-25 years in Victoria, Australia.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

A mixed-methods feasibility study of routinely weighing patients in general practice to aid weight management.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

The Australian Mid-West Coastal Marine Wound Infections Study.

Australian family physician·2018
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical decision-making
  • Clinical heuristics
  • Menopause management

Background:

  • Experienced physicians utilize heuristics (decision-making shortcuts) for efficient practice.
  • While often beneficial, these shortcuts can occasionally lead to errors.
  • Critical reflection on heuristics is essential to mitigate risks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the potential risks associated with decision-making shortcuts.
  • To use hormone therapy (HT) in menopause as a case study for analyzing these pitfalls.

Main Methods:

  • Review of recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on hormone therapy.
  • Analysis of common heuristic biases in clinical practice.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Recent RCTs have altered the understanding of the risk-benefit profile of HT.
  • Previously assumed long-term health benefits of HT were based on flawed decision-making shortcuts.
  • Examples include mistaking association for causation, over-reliance on expert opinion, and assuming biological plausibility equates to proven efficacy.

Conclusions:

  • The perceived benefits of HT for postmenopausal women were influenced by cognitive biases.
  • Re-evaluation of HT's risk-benefit ratio is necessary based on robust evidence.
  • Understanding and addressing decision-making shortcuts is vital for evidence-based medical practice.