Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

323
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
323
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

2.1K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
2.1K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

769
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
769
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

25.3K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.3K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

294
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
294
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Use of real-world evidence in the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program: A checklist for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and manufacturers.

Health affairs scholar·2025
Same author

Improving Food and Drug Administration-Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Coordination for Drugs Granted Accelerated Approval.

The Milbank quarterly·2023
Same author

Turning CMS into a Health Technology Assessment Organization.

The New England journal of medicine·2023
Same author

Proposed framework for patient-centered outcomes-based measures in alternative payment models.

The American journal of managed care·2021
Same author

Introduction.

The Journal of rheumatology·2019
Same author

The increasing complexity of the core outcomes landscape.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.2K

A clinical research strategy to support shared decision making.

Sean R Tunis1

  • 1Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Baltimore, Maryland, USA. sean.tunis@cms.hhs.gov

Health Affairs (Project Hope)
|January 14, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Improving healthcare decisions requires more high-quality evidence. Expanding clinical research through simple trials and registries, alongside strategic planning and funding, is crucial for better patient outcomes and technology evaluation.

More Related Videos

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.7K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.2K
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.7K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.4K

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Clinical Trials
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Limited quantity and quality of evidence impact healthcare decision-making.
  • Patients, physicians, and policymakers need reliable data on treatment benefits, risks, and costs.
  • Current clinical research infrastructure is insufficient to meet evidence demands.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the need for increased evidence in healthcare.
  • To propose strategies for expanding the clinical research enterprise.
  • To improve the quality and quantity of evidence for health decisions.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of evidence gaps in healthcare decision-making.
  • Analysis of current clinical research limitations.
  • Proposal for enhancing research infrastructure and funding.

Main Results:

  • Significant gaps exist in the evidence base for many clinical decisions.
  • Existing research methods and infrastructure are inadequate.
  • Expansion requires prioritized research, improved methods, and increased investment.

Conclusions:

  • A systematic effort is needed to expand clinical research.
  • Establishing research priorities, improving methods, and securing funding are essential.
  • Enhanced evidence production will support informed patient care, policy, and technology adoption.