Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cognitive vulnerability to depression: a dual process model.

Christopher G Beevers1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station A8000, Austin, TX 78712-0187, USA. beevers@psy.utexas.edu

Clinical Psychology Review
|May 21, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A qualitative study of digital CBT for veteran depression: Treatment experiences and recommendations for healthcare system integration.

Psychiatry research·2026
Same author

The longitudinal relations between physical activity, inflammation, and depression in the Health and Retirement Study.

PLOS mental health·2026
Same author

Who exhibits cognitive biases? Mapping heterogeneity in attention, interpretation, and rumination in depression.

Journal of psychopathology and clinical science·2026
Same author

Attention Allocation for Dysphoric Information in Adults with Depression Symptoms Using Eye-tracking and Mouse-tracking.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Survey of mental health care for people with poststroke aphasia: Mixed-methods analysis.

Rehabilitation psychology·2025
Same author

Augmenting Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder With Transcranial Infrared Laser Stimulation.

Biological psychiatry global open science·2025
Same journal

Processes in psychotherapy: A scoping review with LLM-assisted clustering.

Clinical psychology review·2026
Same journal

Effects of mindfulness and mindful eating on food intake and appetite: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clinical psychology review·2026
Same journal

Meta-analysis of associations between childhood emotional abuse and adulthood emotion regulation.

Clinical psychology review·2026
Same journal

A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions addressing sexual and gender minority stress.

Clinical psychology review·2026
Same journal

From fragmentation to transtheoretical models of psychological therapy.

Clinical psychology review·2026
Same journal

Does bullying perpetration predict bullying victimization, or does bullying victimization predict bullying perpetration? An updated meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.

Clinical psychology review·2026
See all related articles

This review proposes a dual process model for understanding depression. It suggests that uncorrected negative thinking, stemming from quick associative processing, increases vulnerability to depression.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychopathology

Background:

  • Dual process models are established in social and personality psychology.
  • These models have been underexplored in clinical contexts, particularly for depression.
  • Cognitive vulnerability is a key factor in understanding depression onset and maintenance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a dual process model of cognitive vulnerability to unipolar depression.
  • To explore the interplay between associative and reflective processing in depression.
  • To discuss implications for depression assessment, etiology, and treatment.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing dual process theories.
  • Application of dual process concepts to cognitive vulnerability in depression.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Synthesis of literature on associative and reflective processing biases.

    • Main Results:

    • Proposes a model where uncorrected negative associative processing leads to depression.
    • Identifies conditions under which reflective processing fails to correct negative biases.
    • Highlights the role of automatic, effortless associative thinking in depressive vulnerability.

    Conclusions:

    • The dual process model offers a novel framework for understanding cognitive vulnerability to depression.
    • Understanding the balance between associative and reflective processing is crucial for intervention.
    • Further research is needed to explore assessment, etiology, and treatment implications.