Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using a faculty evaluation triad to achieve evidence-based teaching.

S E Appling1, P L Naumann, R A Berk

  • 1Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Nursing and Health Care Perspectives
|June 17, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A community-based trial of vocational problem-solving to increase employment among methadone patients.

Journal of substance abuse treatment·2001
Same author

Handgun sales, beer sales, and youth homicide, California, 1972-1993.

Journal of public health policy·2001
Same author

Asthma severity, atopic status, allergen exposure and quality of life in elderly persons.

Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology·2001
Same author

Measuring consensus about scientific research norms.

Science and engineering ethics·2001
Same author

Breast cancer: genetics, risks, and strategies.

The Nursing clinics of North America·2000
Same author

Measuring consumer experiences with primary care.

Pediatrics·2000
Same journal

Faculty matters. Melinda M Swenson.

Nursing and health care perspectives·2006
Same journal

Student contributions to clinical agencies: a comparison of adult health and psychiatric staff nurses' perceptions.

Nursing and health care perspectives·2005
Same journal

Addressing the community research needs of baccalaureate students.

Nursing and health care perspectives·2005
Same journal

Linking remote practice to research: technology in action.

Nursing and health care perspectives·2005
Same journal

After the funding is gone: evaluating the sustainability of a community-based project.

Nursing and health care perspectives·2005
Same journal

Storytelling as cultural assessment.

Nursing and health care perspectives·2005
See all related articles

An effective faculty evaluation system uses student ratings, teaching portfolios, and peer reviews. This comprehensive approach supports faculty development and informs promotion decisions, ensuring teaching excellence.

Area of Science:

  • Educational Administration
  • Faculty Development
  • Higher Education Pedagogy

Background:

  • Effective faculty evaluation systems are crucial for professional growth and institutional decision-making.
  • Existing systems may lack comprehensiveness, failing to provide adequate data for development and promotion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and implement a comprehensive faculty evaluation system.
  • To integrate multiple data sources for robust faculty assessment.
  • To establish a supportive administrative structure for faculty advancement.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a triad of data sources: student ratings, teaching portfolios, and peer evaluations.
  • Implemented a faculty mentorship program.
  • Created an administrative structure for data utilization in merit pay and promotion.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The integrated system provides both formative and summative data.
  • Data supports ongoing faculty development and tenure/promotion decisions.
  • The system facilitates evidence-based assessment of teaching effectiveness.

Conclusions:

  • A comprehensive, multi-source faculty evaluation system is essential for assuring teaching excellence.
  • Integrating student ratings, teaching portfolios, and peer reviews enhances faculty development.
  • Effective administrative structures are vital for leveraging evaluation data for advancement.