Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
A reassessment of the SIDS Back to Sleep Campaign
Ralph Pelligra1, Glen Doman, Gerry Leisman
1Ames Research Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA. Ralph.Pelligra-1@nasa.gov
Insights
The Back to Sleep Campaign (BTSC) aimed to reduce Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) by recommending nonprone infant sleep. This paper questions the SIDS statistics and BTSC
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
Background:
- The Back to Sleep Campaign (BTSC) was launched in 1994.
- It recommended the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) nonprone infant sleeping position advice.
- This aimed to decrease Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To challenge the Back to Sleep Campaign (BTSC).
- To question the validity of SIDS mortality and risk statistics.
- To examine the BTSC as human experimentation versus proven preventive therapy.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of SIDS mortality and risk statistics.
- Evaluation of the causal relationship between infant sleeping position and SIDS rates.
- Review of the BTSC's scientific basis and ethical considerations.
Main Results:
- The study challenges the implied causality between reduced prone sleeping and SIDS decline.
- Concerns are raised regarding the accuracy and interpretation of SIDS statistics.
- The BTSC's foundation on observational data is questioned.
Conclusions:
- The causal link between the Back to Sleep Campaign's recommendations and SIDS reduction requires further scrutiny.
- The validity of SIDS statistics used to justify the campaign is questionable.
- The campaign's implementation as human experimentation rather than confirmed therapy is highlighted.
Abstract:
The Back to Sleep Campaign was initiated in 1994 to implement the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) recommendation that infants be placed in the nonprone sleeping position to reduce the risk of the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). This paper offers a challenge to the Back to Sleep Campaign (BTSC) from two perspectives: (1) the questionable validity of SIDS mortality and risk statistics, and (2) the BTSC as human experimentation rather than as confirmed preventive therapy. The principal argument that initiated the BTSC and that continues to justify its existence is the observed parallel declines in the number of infants placed in the prone sleeping position and the number of reported SIDS deaths. We are compelled to challenge both the implied causal relationship between these observations and the SIDS mortality statistics themselves.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
Insufficient Sleep and Sleep Deprivation
Sleep deprivation is a more severe form of sleep loss...

