Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026
07:36
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018
"Keep your eyes on the prize": reference points and racial differences in assessing progress toward equality
Richard P Eibach1, Joyce Ehrlinger
1Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8205, USA. richard.eibach@yale.edu
Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
|December 1, 2005
Summary
White Americans and ethnic minorities perceive racial equality progress differently. Whites anchor on the past, while minorities focus on ideal standards, creating a perception gap.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Sociology
- Racial Justice Studies
Background:
- Disparities in perceived racial equality progress exist between White Americans and ethnic minorities.
- Understanding the psychological underpinnings of these differing perceptions is crucial for addressing racial inequality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the hypothesis that differing reference points explain the perception gap in racial equality progress.
- To examine how framing and deliberation time influence these perceptions.
Main Methods:
- Correlational analysis (Study 1).
- Experimental framing manipulations (Studies 2 and 3).
- Assessment of deliberation time effects (Study 4).
Main Results:
- Whites spontaneously anchor on past conditions, while ethnic minorities anchor on ideal standards for assessing progress.
- The perception gap in racial equality progress is influenced by the reference points used by different racial groups.
- Increased deliberation time impacts the perception gap, supporting the reference point hypothesis.
Conclusions:
- Differing spontaneous reference points significantly contribute to the racial perception gap regarding equality progress.
- Findings have implications for survey methodology and understanding intergroup political conflict.
- Addressing the perception gap requires acknowledging and potentially bridging these divergent anchoring strategies.
Related Concept Videos
02:55Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
02:09Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
01:27Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
Social comparison plays a fundamental role in the evaluation of personal success and self-worth. Rather than assessing our achievements in isolation, we interpret their significance relative to personal goals and critically in comparison to the performance of others. A grade of B in a mathematics exam might elicit pride if one's expectation was a C, yet result in disappointment if an A was anticipated or if peers achieved superior results. These comparative evaluations illustrate how both...
01:25Motivational Bias
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
01:27Halo Effect
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
01:26Equity Theory
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...