Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cervical disc arthroplasty: general introduction.

Frank L Acosta1, Christopher P Ames

  • 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, Moffitt Hospital, CA 94143, USA.

Neurosurgery Clinics of North America
|December 6, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patient-specific Cervical Deformity Corrections With Consideration of Associated Risk: Establishment of Risk Benefit Thresholds for Invasiveness Based on Deformity and Frailty Severity.

Clinical spine surgery·2023
Same author

Economic burden of nonoperative treatment of adult spinal deformity.

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2023
Same author

The ISSG-AO Complication Intervention Score, but Not Major/Minor Designation, is Correlated With Length of Stay Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Global spine journal·2023
Same author

Functional Alignment Within the Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) Improves Outcomes and Minimizes Mechanical Failures.

Spine·2023
Same author

Are We Focused on the Wrong Early Postoperative Quality Metrics? Optimal Realignment Outweighs Perioperative Risk in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Journal of clinical medicine·2023
Same author

Are we improving in the optimization of surgery for high-risk adult cervical spine deformity patients over time?

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2023
Same journal

Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors.

Neurosurgery clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Spinal Cord Deformities Associated with Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors.

Neurosurgery clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Radiation Therapy for Spinal Cord Tumors.

Neurosurgery clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Treatment Strategies of Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors.

Neurosurgery clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Vascular Lesions of the Spinal Cord: Arteriovenous and Cavernous Malformations.

Neurosurgery clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Hemangioblastomas of the Spinal Cord.

Neurosurgery clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Cervical disc arthroplasty offers motion preservation for degenerative disc disease, proving as effective as fusion with fewer complications and faster recovery. Long-term studies are needed to confirm efficacy and identify optimal patient candidates.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Neurosurgery
  • Spinal Surgery

Background:

  • Degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine is a common condition requiring treatment.
  • Traditional treatments like anterior discectomy and fusion can lead to adjacent segment disease.
  • Motion-preserving techniques are sought to mitigate these drawbacks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate cervical disc arthroplasty as a motion-preserving alternative to cervical fusion.
  • To compare the efficacy and safety of cervical disc arthroplasty with cervical fusion.
  • To assess the impact of cervical disc arthroplasty on adjacent segment disease and patient function.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on cervical disc arthroplasty and cervical fusion.
  • Comparison of outcomes including symptomatic relief, perioperative morbidity, and functional recovery.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of complication rates and adjacent segment disease incidence.

    • Main Results:

    • Cervical disc arthroplasty demonstrates comparable symptomatic relief to cervical fusion.
    • The procedure reduces perioperative morbidity and eliminates the need for external immobilization.
    • Patients experience an earlier return to normal function after cervical disc arthroplasty.
    • No significant complications have been reported to date.

    Conclusions:

    • Cervical disc arthroplasty is an effective motion-preserving treatment for symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease.
    • It offers advantages over cervical fusion, including reduced complications and improved functional outcomes.
    • Further large-scale, randomized, prospective studies are necessary to establish long-term efficacy and define ideal patient populations.