Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

The Prestige cervical disc.

Vincent C Traynelis1

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. vincent-traynelis@uiowa.edu

Neurosurgery Clinics of North America
|December 6, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Role of T2 pedicle subtraction osteotomy in rigid cervicothoracic sagittal imbalance correction: A case series with technical details.

Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine·2026
Same author

Introduction. Contemporary spinal arthroplasty.

Neurosurgical focus·2026
Same author

Comparing risk stratification indices in predicting perioperative adverse events following posterior atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fusion.

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2026
Same author

The Blaming of the Screw: A Cautionary Tale of Innovation, Regulation, and Mass Tort in Spine Surgery.

Neurosurgery·2026
Same author

Comparative analysis of the impacts of 30-day perioperative complications on patient-reported outcome measures following multilevel anterior versus posterior cervical fusion.

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2024
Same author

Correction: The leptomeninges as a critical organ for normal CNS development and function: First patient and public involved systematic review of arachnoiditis (chronic meningitis).

PloS one·2024
Same journal

Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors.

Neurosurgery clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Spinal Cord Deformities Associated with Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors.

Neurosurgery clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Radiation Therapy for Spinal Cord Tumors.

Neurosurgery clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Treatment Strategies of Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors.

Neurosurgery clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Vascular Lesions of the Spinal Cord: Arteriovenous and Cavernous Malformations.

Neurosurgery clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Hemangioblastomas of the Spinal Cord.

Neurosurgery clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

This article examines the evolution, surgical application, and clinical performance of the Prestige LP artificial cervical disc, a device used to replace damaged spinal discs while maintaining neck movement. It provides an overview of patient selection, implantation procedures, and ongoing regulatory evaluations.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery outcomes research within Prestige cervical disc medicine
  • Biomedical engineering and spinal implant technology

Background:

Limited information exists regarding the long-term clinical performance and historical evolution of specific motion-sparing spinal implants. While anterior cervical decompression is a standard procedure, the integration of artificial disc technology remains a subject of ongoing investigation. Prior research has shown that traditional fusion techniques often restrict natural neck movement. This gap motivated a comprehensive review of the Prestige LP device. No prior work had resolved the specific clinical outcomes associated with this latest generation of implants. That uncertainty drove the need for a detailed summary of current regulatory status and surgical indications. Researchers have sought to clarify how these devices compare to older models in real-world settings. This analysis provides a structured overview of the device's trajectory within modern spinal care.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the Prestige LP artificial cervical disc. This study addresses the historical development and clinical performance of the device over the past decade. The authors seek to clarify the indications for spinal arthroplasty in patients requiring decompression. A primary motivation is to summarize the status of current United States Food and Drug Administration trials. The researchers intend to outline the specific surgical techniques necessary for successful implantation. This work addresses the need for a consolidated resource on motion-sparing spinal technologies. By synthesizing existing data, the authors aim to assist clinicians in making informed treatment decisions. The study provides a clear framework for understanding the role of this implant in modern orthopedic care.

Keywords:
Spinal arthroplastyCervical decompressionMotion-sparing implantsSpine surgery outcomes

Frequently Asked Questions

The researchers propose that the Prestige LP disc facilitates anterior reconstruction while preserving natural spinal movement. This outcome contrasts with traditional fusion techniques, which typically restrict neck flexibility after surgery. The device serves as a motion-sparing alternative for patients undergoing decompression.

The authors describe the Prestige LP as the most recent iteration of a device that has been utilized for over ten years. This evolution reflects ongoing improvements in spinal implant design and surgical application. The device represents a significant advancement over earlier versions of the same technology.

The authors state that anterior cervical decompression is a necessary prerequisite for the implantation of this device. This procedure ensures that the spinal cord or nerve roots are properly relieved before the disc is inserted. Proper decompression is required for successful arthroplasty.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

Review Approach framing involves a comprehensive synthesis of historical device development and clinical performance records. The authors examined longitudinal data spanning more than ten years of surgical applications. This investigation included a detailed assessment of current United States Food and Drug Administration trial documentation. The study design focused on identifying specific indications for spinal arthroplasty procedures. Researchers evaluated surgical techniques required for the successful placement of the motion-sparing implant. The methodology prioritized the integration of existing clinical evidence to support treatment recommendations. This systematic approach allowed for a clear comparison between traditional fusion and modern disc replacement strategies. The authors synthesized these diverse data sources to provide a cohesive overview of the current clinical landscape.

Main Results:

Key Findings From the Literature suggest that the Prestige LP device has been successfully utilized for over a decade in clinical settings. The authors report that this implant serves as an effective tool for anterior reconstruction during cervical decompression. Evidence indicates that the device allows for the preservation of spinal movement, unlike traditional fusion procedures. The review highlights that patient selection is a critical determinant of successful surgical results. Data from ongoing United States Food and Drug Administration trials provide support for the continued use of this technology. The findings demonstrate that the current generation of the disc offers improved performance compared to earlier iterations. Clinical outcomes consistently show that the device is a reliable option for specific patient populations. The synthesis of available literature confirms the utility of this implant in modern spinal surgery.

Conclusions:

Synthesis and Implications framing suggests that the Prestige LP device represents a viable alternative for patients requiring spinal decompression. The authors propose that this technology effectively preserves natural neck motion compared to traditional fusion methods. Clinical evidence indicates that patient selection remains a primary factor in achieving successful surgical outcomes. The review highlights that the device has undergone significant refinement over the past decade of use. Ongoing regulatory evaluations continue to monitor the safety and efficacy of these implants in the United States. Practitioners should consider these findings when determining the most appropriate treatment path for cervical spine conditions. The authors emphasize that anterior reconstruction with this implant offers a reliable option for specific clinical presentations. Future clinical practice will likely continue to integrate these motion-sparing strategies into standard surgical protocols.

The article incorporates clinical outcome data and information from ongoing United States Food and Drug Administration trials. These datasets provide the foundation for evaluating the safety and efficacy of the implant. This information is used to assess the current status of the device in clinical practice.

The researchers measure success through the assessment of clinical outcomes and the evaluation of patient selection criteria. These metrics help determine which individuals are most suitable for arthroplasty. Successful results are linked to careful candidate identification and precise surgical execution.

The authors propose that this implant is an excellent treatment option for selected patients requiring anterior cervical surgery. They suggest that the device provides a reliable method for maintaining spinal function. This conclusion is based on the synthesis of historical data and current clinical experience.