Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The role of response selection in sequence learning.

Natacha Deroost1, Eric Soetens

  • 1Department of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium. Natacha.Deroost@vub.ac.be

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|April 22, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From an integrative perspective: the role of inhibitory processes in non-clinical disordered eating behaviors.

Eating disorders·2026
Same author

Early event-related potential differentiation of alcohol cues associates with subjective craving levels in severe alcohol use disorder.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2026
Same author

Repeated beta transcranial alternating current stimulation disrupts consolidation and retention of motor sequence learning.

Brain research bulletin·2026
Same author

There is more social in semantics! A brief commentary and reanalysis of Balgova et al. (2024).

Neuropsychologia·2025
Same author

The neural basis of sequence learning: A neuroimaging meta-analysis across social, cognitive and motor domains.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2025
Same author

Human cerebellum and social navigation: cerebello-cerebral connectivity using dynamic causal modelling.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2025
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Visual Selection Is Spatially Constrained During Working Memory Consolidation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Cross-Phoneme Generalisation of Dimension-Based Statistical Learning for Stop Voicing: Probing Subject Design and Word Frame Effects.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

Sequence learning in the serial reaction time (SRT) task improves with incompatible stimulus-response mappings. This suggests controlled response selection enhances sequence learning effectiveness.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Sequence learning is crucial for skilled performance.
  • The serial reaction time (SRT) task is a common paradigm for studying implicit sequence learning.
  • The role of response selection in sequence learning remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of stimulus-response compatibility on sequence learning within the SRT task.
  • To determine if sequence learning is modulated by the level of control required during response selection.

Main Methods:

  • Participants completed the SRT task with varying degrees of stimulus-response compatibility.
  • Perceptual, response-based, and response-effect learning were monitored.
  • Stimulus discriminability was manipulated to control for task difficulty.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Sequence learning was significantly enhanced under incompatible stimulus-response mapping conditions compared to compatible ones.
  • Other learning types (perceptual, response-based, response-effect) were not affected by compatibility.
  • Stimulus discriminability did not influence the extent of sequence learning.

Conclusions:

  • Sequence learning in the SRT task is facilitated by controlled response selection processes.
  • Incompatible stimulus-response mappings promote more controlled selection, thereby improving sequence learning.
  • Findings align with the dimensional overlap model, emphasizing the importance of response selection control.