Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Recommendations implicit in policy defaults.

Craig R M McKenzie1, Michael J Liersch, Stacey R Finkelstein

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, 92093, USA. cmckenzie@ucsd.edu

Psychological Science
|May 11, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Citation penalties following sexual versus scientific misconduct allegations.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Choices without preferences: Principles of rational arbitrariness.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

A machine learning (ML) approach to understanding participation in government nutrition programs.

Current opinion in psychology·2024
Same author

Incomplete preferences and rational framing effects.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2022
Same author

Is it a judgment of representativeness? Re-examining the birth sequence problem.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2022
Same author

Editorial for "A multi method exploration of marketing factors that can be used to improve access to healthy foods and increase healthy food consumption".

Appetite·2021
Same journal

A Field Experiment Testing Whether Accountability Reduces Racial Gaps in Performance Evaluations.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Does Testosterone Affect Cognitive Reflection? Evidence From a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study of 1,000 Participants.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Does Overconfidence Really Confer Adaptive Benefits to Children's Learning?

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

How Does the Mind Grow? Cross-Cultural Intuitive Theories of Mental Development.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Not All Practice Is Created Equal: Longitudinal Evidence From Over 40,000 Chess Players.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Eye Glint as a Novel Perceptual Cue in Human Vision.

Psychological science·2026
See all related articles

Organ donation policy defaults significantly impact donor numbers. Opt-out organ donation systems, where individuals are presumed donors unless they opt-out, can save thousands of lives annually by increasing donor availability.

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Public Policy
  • Health Systems

Background:

  • Organ donation is a critical issue with a persistent shortage of donors.
  • Current organ donation policies in many regions default to opt-in, requiring explicit consent.
  • This default setting has been linked to suboptimal donor rates and preventable deaths.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of default options on organ donation rates.
  • To explore the psychological mechanisms behind default effects in policy decisions.
  • To examine how policymakers' default choices influence public behavior and outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted four experiments analyzing default effects in organ donation and retirement savings.
  • Manipulated default policies to assess behavioral responses.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed public perception of default options as recommended actions.

    • Main Results:

    • Default effects were observed in both organ donation and retirement savings domains.
    • The choice of default significantly influences whether individuals become organ donors.
    • People interpret defaults as implicit recommendations from policymakers.

    Conclusions:

    • Policymakers' default choices in organ donation have life-or-death consequences.
    • Shifting to an opt-out organ donation default could substantially increase donor availability.
    • Awareness of implicit messaging in default policies is crucial for effective public health interventions.