Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Summation in causal learning: elemental processing or configural generalization?

Darrell J Collins1, David R Shanks

  • 1University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|July 29, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does Overconfidence Really Confer Adaptive Benefits to Children's Learning?

Psychological science·2026
Same author

Nothing to see here: The weak evidence base for unconscious control of human behavior.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Replicating the unconscious working memory effect: a multisite Registered Report.

Neuroscience of consciousness·2026
Same author

Good Learners Are Poor Monitors: A Negative Relation Between Learning Ability and Monitoring Accuracy.

Psychological science·2025
Same author

Studying unconscious processing: Contention and consensus.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same journal

EXPRESS: When illusion rivals reality. Investigating error detection and the role of working memory resources in the Vanishing Ball Illusion.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Metaphors and the Body: Perceived Locations for the Self are Influenced by Conceptual Metaphor.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

This study investigated human causal learning, finding evidence for both summation and overexpectation phenomena. These results support elemental learning theories over configural models when outcome magnitude varies.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Learning Theory

Background:

  • Causal learning research often relies on the elemental Rescorla-Wagner model.
  • Pearce's configural model offers an alternative interpretation for multi-cue learning.
  • Distinguishing between these models is crucial for understanding associative learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between elemental and configural models of causal learning.
  • To investigate the phenomena of summation and overexpectation in human learning.
  • To examine how varying outcome magnitudes influence learning interpretations.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted using human causal learning tasks.
  • A procedure involving variable outcome magnitudes was employed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The study focused on demonstrating summation and overexpectation effects.

    • Main Results:

    • Evidence for summation was observed in the experiments.
    • Evidence for overexpectation was also obtained.
    • These findings align with predictions from elemental learning theories.

    Conclusions:

    • The results provide empirical support for elemental theories of causal learning.
    • Demonstrations of summation and overexpectation challenge purely configural accounts.
    • Varying outcome magnitude is a key factor in discriminating between learning models.