Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reasoning about the relations between relations.

Geoffrey P Goodwin1, P N Johnson-Laird

  • 1Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. ggoodwin@princeton.edu

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|August 4, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lay beliefs about the badness, likelihood, and importance of human extinction.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Are moral people happier? Answers from reputation-based measures of moral character.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2025
Same author

Mistakes in Thinking about Cognitive Science and How to Reduce Them.

eNeuro·2024
Same author

Reasoning From Quantified Modal Premises.

Cognitive science·2024
Same author

Reasoning about possibilities: Modal logics, possible worlds, and mental models.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024
Same author

How and why people want to be more moral.

Journal of personality·2023
Same journal

EXPRESS: When illusion rivals reality. Investigating error detection and the role of working memory resources in the Vanishing Ball Illusion.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Metaphors and the Body: Perceived Locations for the Self are Influenced by Conceptual Metaphor.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a mental model theory explaining how people reason with higher-order relations, vital for science. Experiments show inference difficulty depends on integrating information into a single model.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychological Science
  • Reasoning and Decision Making

Background:

  • Higher-order relations, where relations hold between other relations, are crucial for complex reasoning in science and mathematics.
  • Existing theories fail to adequately explain the cognitive processes underlying inferences involving these complex relational structures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel theory of reasoning based on mental models to explain higher-order relational inferences.
  • To experimentally validate the proposed mental model theory and investigate the cognitive strategies employed.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted to test the mental model theory.
  • Participants performed inferences from premises involving higher-order relations.
  • Think-aloud protocols and controlled conditions (e.g., prohibiting written workings) were used to analyze reasoning strategies.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Inference difficulty was directly related to the integration of information from multiple premises into a single mental model.
  • Participants spontaneously developed and employed distinct reasoning strategies, which were assembled "bottom up" from tactical steps.

Conclusions:

  • The mental model theory provides a robust framework for understanding higher-order relational reasoning.
  • Cognitive strategies for these inferences are flexible and constructed based on the integration of information and available tactical steps.