Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Relevant distractors do not cause negative priming.

Christian Frings1

  • 1Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany. c.frings@mx.uni-saarland.de

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|August 9, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Theta band activity during event-file retrieval is influenced by stimulus salience in the preceding action episode.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Perception and action as one: Re-integrating research on human action through event files.

Psychological review·2026
Same author

Binding and retrieval of omitted responses in complex response sequences.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

From prediction to control: Age-related dissociations between implicit regularity encoding and attentional modulation during perception-action integration.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

A Multiplexed Neural Code Governs Dynamic Perception-Action Reconfiguration during Response Inhibition.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

The sound of silence: Binding and retrieval of silence in distractor-response binding.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Highly relevant stimuli, like your own name, grab attention easily. Trying to ignore them is difficult, and unlike other names, your own name doesn't show slowed reactions after being ignored.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Attention Studies

Background:

  • Highly relevant stimuli, such as personal names, capture attention even in partially attended environments (e.g., cocktail party effect).
  • Previous research shows relevant stimuli are easily detected and difficult to ignore.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if attempts to ignore highly relevant stimuli (own name) are hampered.
  • To examine the effect of ignoring own names on subsequent reaction times compared to other names.

Main Methods:

  • A negative priming task was employed with 32 participants.
  • Participants were instructed to ignore first names presented as distractors.
  • Reaction times were measured for stimuli that had been previously ignored.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Participants successfully ignored other participants' names, showing slowed reaction times to these previously ignored stimuli (negative priming).
  • No such slowing (negative priming) was observed for participants' own names when they were previously used as distractors.
  • This indicates that participants could not effectively inhibit their own names from attention.

Conclusions:

  • The ability to inhibit highly relevant stimuli, particularly one's own name, is limited.
  • Attention is automatically captured by personally relevant information, overriding deliberate attempts at suppression.
  • Findings extend understanding of attentional control and the processing of salient personal stimuli.