Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Cryo-Electron Tomography Workflow for Thick Tissues Demonstrated in Mouse Hippocampus
Published on: March 27, 2026
Can you trust your cryostat? Reproducibility of cryostat section thickness
Philip C De Witt Hamer1, Fonnet E Bleeker, Aeilko H Zwinderman
1Department of Neurosurgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. P.C.deWittHamer@amc.nl
Abstract:
Reproducibility of cryostat section thickness is required for valid quantitative microscopy. This is generally pursued by motorized sectioning using a low but constant speed. The purpose of our study was to compare variation in section thickness between motorized and manual cryostat sectioning. Serial sections were cut from a frozen block of homogenized tissue on different days. Lactate dehydrogenase activity was histochemically detected and calibrated absorbance measurements were taken. The coefficients of variation of measurements was 9.7% for motorized sectioning and 3.3% for manual sectioning. In conclusion, section thickness is similarly reproducible after manual sectioning compared with motorized sectioning, if not better.

