Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spine: minimally invasive techniques.

Peter C Gerszten1, William C Welch

  • 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Health System, Pittsburgh, Pa., USA.

Progress in Neurological Surgery
|October 13, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Posterior lumbar facet arthroplasty versus fusion for the treatment of spondylolisthesis: 3-year results from the Total Posterior Spine System investigational device exemption study.

Neurosurgical focus·2026
Same author

Risk factors for elevated endotracheal tube cuff pressure in anterior cervical spine surgery.

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2026
Same author

Incidence and outcomes of spinopelvic fixation loosening following adult spinal deformity surgery.

Spine deformity·2026
Same author

Development and validation of a machine learning model utilizing the ACS-NSQIP database for predicting early postoperative Re-operation in lumbar microdiscectomy.

Brain & spine·2026
Same author

Socioeconomic status and outcomes following spine stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Journal of neuro-oncology·2026
Same author

Spinal cord stimulation for upper limb motor function in people with chronic post-stroke hemiparesis: a feasibility trial.

Nature medicine·2026
Same journal

Transcranial Neurostimulation (rTMS, tDCS) in the Treatment of Chronic Orofacial Pain.

Progress in neurological surgery·2020
Same journal

Anatomy of Trigeminal Neuromodulation Targets: From Periphery to the Brain.

Progress in neurological surgery·2020
Same journal

Motor Cortex Stimulation for Facial Pain.

Progress in neurological surgery·2020
Same journal

Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation for Facial Pain.

Progress in neurological surgery·2020
Same journal

Deep Brain Stimulation for Facial Pain.

Progress in neurological surgery·2020
Same journal

High-Frequency Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Craniofacial Pain.

Progress in neurological surgery·2020
See all related articles

Minimally invasive spine surgery offers new techniques but lacks long-term data. Randomized trials are crucial to confirm benefits and justify costs compared to open surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Spine surgery
  • Minimally invasive procedures
  • Surgical outcomes

Background:

  • Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) techniques, including decompression, arthrodesis, and instrumentation, are increasingly used in percutaneous, laparoscopic, and minimal access approaches.
  • There is a scarcity of longitudinal, long-term data evaluating the efficacy, indications, limitations, and complications of these MISS procedures compared to traditional open techniques.
  • Existing spine outcomes instruments may not adequately capture the specific advantages offered by minimally invasive approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the need for robust data on minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS).
  • To emphasize the importance of randomized trials for substantiating the benefits of MISS.
  • To address the justification of increased costs associated with advanced MISS techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS).
  • Analysis of the limitations of existing outcome measures for MISS.
  • Advocacy for the implementation of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Main Results:

  • Limited long-term data exists for minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) efficacy and complications.
  • Current outcome instruments may not fully represent MISS benefits.
  • Randomized trials are essential for evidence-based validation.

Conclusions:

  • Substantiating the benefits of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) requires rigorous, long-term data from randomized trials.
  • Evidence is needed to justify the higher costs often associated with MISS.
  • Further research is critical for establishing definitive indications and limitations of MISS.