Related Experiment Videos
[Cochrane reviews compared with industry-supported and other meta-analyses of the same drugs--secondary publication]
Anders W Jørgensen1, Jørgen Hilden, Peter C Gøtzsche
1Det Nordiske Cochrane Center, H:S Rigshospitalet, Afdeling 7112, DK-2100 København Ø. pcg@cochrane.dk.
Abstract:
24 Cochrane reviews were compared with other, closely matched, meta-analyses of the same drugs. The quality score was highest for Cochrane reviews (7 vs. 2, p < 0.01). Of 8 industry-supported reviews, 7 with conclusions all recommended the experimental drug without reservations, compared with none of the Cochrane reviews (p = 0.02) although the estimated treatment effect was similar on average (p = 0.64). Industry-supported reviews were less transparent, had few reservations about methodological limitations of the included trials, and should be read with caution.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Combined Effects of Drugs: Antagonism
The most common type is receptor antagonism, where one drug acts as an antagonist to block the effects of another drug by...