Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
A randomized controlled trial for maintaining peripheral intravenous lock in children
Esther Mok1, Tany K Y Kwong, Moon Fai Chan
1School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong. hsemok@inet.polyu.edu.hk
Insights
For maintaining peripheral intravenous locks in children, this study found no significant differences in catheter longevity or complications among normal saline, 1 unit/ml heparin saline, and 10 units/ml heparin saline flush solutions. The 1 unit/ml heparin group showed a higher survival rate.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nursing
- Intravenous Therapy
- Clinical Practice Research
Background:
- Maintaining peripheral intravenous (IV) access in children is crucial.
- Previous studies on IV flush solutions (saline vs. heparin) in pediatric populations yielded conflicting results.
- Optimal flush solution for pediatric peripheral IV locks remains an open clinical question.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness and safety of normal saline, 1 unit/ml heparin saline, and 10 units/ml heparin saline for maintaining pediatric peripheral IV locks.
- To establish evidence-based practice for IV flush solutions in a hospital setting.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, randomized controlled, double-blind trial involving 123 children aged 1-10 years.
- Participants received one of three flush solutions: normal saline, 1 unit/ml heparin saline, or 10 units/ml heparin saline.
- Evaluated outcomes included catheter dwell time, survival rate, and incidence of IV complications.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences were observed in catheter use duration, survival rates, or IV complication incidence among the three groups.
- The 1 unit/ml heparin saline group exhibited the highest survival rate, with a mean catheter use of 49.8 hours compared to 32.5 hours for normal saline.
- Despite a trend, overall catheter longevity and complication rates did not significantly differ between the flushing solutions.
Conclusions:
- Normal saline, 1 unit/ml heparin saline, and 10 units/ml heparin saline are comparable for maintaining pediatric peripheral IV locks regarding longevity and complications.
- A trend towards improved catheter survival was noted with 1 unit/ml heparin saline.
- Further research may be needed to clarify potential benefits of low-dose heparin flushes.
Abstract:
The most effective and safe method of maintaining peripheral intravenous lock in children is an important clinical question that has been identified by the researchers. The results of recent studies comparing saline versus 10 units/ml of heparin saline flush using a 24-gauge catheter in neonatal and pediatric populations are conflicting and inconclusive. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of three flush solutions: normal saline, 1 unit/ml of heparin saline and 10 units/ml of heparin saline for maintaining peripheral intravenous locks in children, and to establish a research-based practice in the study hospital. In a prospective, randomized controlled, double-blind trial, one hundred and twenty-three subjects ranging in age from 1-10 years with 123 intravenous locks were randomly chosen to receive 1 unit/ml of heparin saline, 10 units/ml of heparin saline and normal saline to evaluate length of catheter use, survival rate and incidence of intravenous complications. The study found no statistically significant differences in length of catheter use, estimated catheter survival and the incidence of intravenous complications among the three groups. The group that received 1 unit/ml of heparin saline demonstrated the highest rate of survival. The mean length of catheter use of the group that received 1 unit/ml of heparin saline (49.8 hours) was 17 hours longer than the group that received normal saline (32.5 hours). There are no significant differences among the three types of flushing solution in terms of the catheter longevity and incidence of intravenous complications.
Related Concept Videos
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...