Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026
06:55
Scanning Light Scattering Profiler (SLPS) Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
Published on: June 6, 2017
Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements using Orbscan II and IOLMaster
I B Frisch1, T M Rabsilber, K A Becker
1Department of Ophthalmology, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
European Journal of Ophthalmology
|May 31, 2007
Summary
The Orbscan II and IOLMaster provide comparable anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements. These devices are interchangeable for clinical ACD evaluations, aiding in refractive surgery planning.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Biomedical Optics
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Accurate anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurement is crucial for ophthalmic procedures, particularly refractive surgery.
- Comparing diagnostic devices ensures optimal clinical practice and patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements obtained from the Orbscan II and IOLMaster devices.
- To determine the interchangeability of these two instruments for clinical ACD assessment.
Main Methods:
- A prospective clinical study involving 145 phakic eyes from 145 participants (30 healthy volunteers, 115 patients).
- Anterior chamber depth (ACD) was measured using both Orbscan II and IOLMaster, from the corneal epithelium to the anterior lens surface.
- Axial length (AL) was also measured with the IOLMaster to assess its correlation with ACD.
Main Results:
- Mean ACD measurements were similar between Orbscan II (3.35±0.43 mm) and IOLMaster (3.36±0.41 mm).
- A high linear regression coefficient (R=0.95) was found between the two methods for ACD.
- Bland-Altman analysis showed 95% of differences within ±0.27 mm, indicating good agreement.
Conclusions:
- Both Orbscan II and IOLMaster demonstrate high agreement in measuring anterior chamber depth (ACD).
- The findings suggest that these devices are clinically interchangeable for ACD evaluation.
- This interchangeability supports their use in routine ophthalmic practice and surgical planning.
