Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Published on: November 11, 2011

Task demands affect manual asymmetries in pegboard performance.

P J Bryden¹, E A Roy, L E Rohr

¹Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. pbryden@wlu.ca

|June 15, 2007

Summary

Manual asymmetries are influenced by task complexity. This study found that placing pegs into holes, compared to receptacles, revealed greater performance differences between hands on the Grooved Pegboard Test.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Object-Tool-Actor Interaction: Object Information Drives Intended Action.

Journal of motor behavior·2017

Same author

The influence of action execution on end-state comfort and underlying movement kinematics: An examination of right and left handed participants.

Acta psychologica·2015

Same author

Motor skills in Czech children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and their neurotypical counterparts.

Research in developmental disabilities·2013

Same author

Absolute error.

Journal of motor behavior·2013

Same author

Measuring change in motor memory.

Journal of motor behavior·2013

Same author

Closed-loop control of a ballistic response.

Journal of motor behavior·2013

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Human Motor Control
Cognitive Psychology

Background:

Previous research indicated task demands influence manual asymmetries on the Grooved Pegboard Test.
A potential confound of differing peg starting positions was identified in prior studies.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the impact of peg starting position on between-hand performance differences.
To clarify the role of task demands in manual asymmetries using the Grooved Pegboard Test.

Main Methods:

Thirty right-handed participants completed four conditions manipulating peg start and end positions.
Each participant performed five trials per hand for each condition.
Performance was assessed using the Grooved Pegboard Test.

More Related Videos

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors

Published on: May 2, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Published on: November 11, 2011

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors

Published on: May 2, 2021

Main Results:

No significant effect of starting position on performance was observed.
A significant interaction between hand and end position demonstrated greater right-hand advantage when placing pegs into holes versus receptacles.
This finding persisted when using a laterality quotient.

Conclusions:

Task complexity, specifically the act of placing pegs into holes, significantly influences manual asymmetries.
The results underscore the importance of considering task-specific demands when interpreting manual asymmetries.