Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Is there an alternative to increasing the sample size in microarray studies?

Lev Klebanov1, Andrei Yakovlev

  • 1Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 630, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.

Bioinformation
|June 29, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Variability of aggregation extent of light-harvesting pigments in peripheral antenna of Chloroflexus aurantiacus.

Photosynthesis research·2017
Same author

Orientation of B798 BChl a Q y transition dipoles in Chloroflexus aurantiacus chlorosomes: polarized transient absorption spectroscopy studies.

Photosynthesis research·2014
Same author

Gene selection with the δ-sequence method.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2013
Same author

Aggregation effect in microarray data analysis.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2013
Same author

Balancing Type One and Two Errors in Multiple Testing for Differential Expression of Genes.

Computational statistics & data analysis·2010
Same author

Detecting intergene correlation changes in microarray analysis: a new approach to gene selection.

BMC bioinformatics·2009
Same journal

Assessment of lower incisor position and symphysis dimensions among different skeletal patterns in the Chhattisgarh population.

Bioinformation·2026
Same journal

Low T3 syndrome and short-term outcomes in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: A retrospective observational study.

Bioinformation·2026
Same journal

Cardiovascular risk prevention awareness and practices in type 2 diabetes: Linking HbA1c and lipid levels.

Bioinformation·2026
Same journal

Assessment of periodontal condition using basic periodontal examination scores: A retrospective clinical study.

Bioinformation·2026
Same journal

Comparative evaluation of osseointegration among different surface modification techniques in dental implants.

Bioinformation·2026
Same journal

Micro-osteoperforations' impact on orthodontic tooth movement rate: Split mouth research.

Bioinformation·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Small sample sizes are inappropriate for microarray studies. These studies should be viewed as more than just screening tools, demanding larger sample sizes for robust results.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Microarray technology enables high-throughput gene expression analysis.
  • Current practices often utilize small sample sizes in microarray studies.

Observation:

  • The utility of microarray data is frequently underestimated.
  • Small sample sizes limit the statistical power and reliability of microarray findings.

Findings:

  • Microarray studies require adequate sample sizes to be considered valid research.
  • The perception of microarrays solely as screening tools is challenged.

Implications:

  • Revising statistical methodologies for genomic research.
  • Enhancing the rigor and reproducibility of gene expression studies.

Related Experiment Videos