Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in cochlear implant users.

M Hey1, I Kevanishvili, H von Specht

  • 1St. Salvator Hospital, Halberstadt, and Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.

Georgian Medical News
|July 31, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Preventable deaths related to haemorrhage in England and Wales, 2013-2022: A systematic case series of coroners' reports.

Public health·2025
Same author

Preventable deaths related to thromboembolism in England and Wales, 2013-2022: A systematic case series of coroners' reports.

Public health·2025
Same author

STUTTERING: INITIATING FACTORS, EVOLUTION, HEALING PERSPECTIVES.

Georgian medical news·2021
Same author

HNO·2019
Same author

[Characterization of a closed-set logatome test : Documentation of audiometric data: discrimination function and reproducibility].

HNO·2019
Same author

Speech audiometry and data logging in CI patients : Implications for adequate test levels.

HNO·2017
Same journal

NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR RESTLESS LEG SYNDROME IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS.

Georgian medical news·2026
Same journal

CLINICAL RESULTS OF DELORME'S AND ALTEMEIER'S PROCEDURES IN RECTAL PROLAPSE.

Georgian medical news·2026
Same journal

EVALUATION OF GEORGIAN MEDICAL DOCTORS' RESEARCH EXPERIENCE AND PERCEPTIONS TOWARD COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH WITH UNIVERSITIES.

Georgian medical news·2026
Same journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF USING SUGGESTIVE METHODS IN COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY.

Georgian medical news·2026
Same journal

MORPHOLOGY AND PREVALENCE OF C-SHAPED CANALS IN MANDIBULAR FIRST MOLARS OF AN IRAQI KURDISTAN REGION POPULATION: A CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ASSESSMENT.

Georgian medical news·2026
Same journal

DERMATOSURGERY ROUNDS: THE DOUBLE ROTATION (YIN-YANG) FLAP AS BASIC WEAPON IN THE FIGHT AGAINST KERATINOCYTE CANCER OF THE SCALP.

Georgian medical news·2026
See all related articles

Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (eeABRs) in cochlear implant users differ from acoustically evoked ones (aeABRs) in normally hearing individuals, showing altered waveforms and faster neural transmission. These eeABRs reveal insights into auditory processing without natural cochlear function.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Neurophysiology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Cochlear implants bypass damaged cochlear structures to provide sound perception.
  • Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) are electrophysiological measures of auditory pathway function.
  • Comparing electrically and acoustically evoked ABRs (eeABRs vs. aeABRs) can elucidate the role of cochlear mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the waveforms and parameters of eeABRs in cochlear implant users with aeABRs in normally hearing subjects.
  • To investigate the impact of cochlear implants on auditory pathway electrophysiological measures.
  • To understand how the absence of cochlear processing affects ABR characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • Recording and analyzing electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (eeABRs) in cochlear implant users.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Recording and analyzing acoustically evoked auditory brainstem responses (aeABRs) in normally hearing individuals.
  • Comparing specific waveform components (e.g., Wave IV, VI, VII), peak latencies, inter-peak intervals, and amplitudes between the two groups.

    • Main Results:

    • eeABRs showed altered waveforms, including a dubious Wave IV and absent Waves VI and VII, compared to aeABRs.
    • eeABRs exhibited shorter peak latencies, shorter inter-peak intervals, and greater amplitudes than aeABRs.
    • Both eeABRs and aeABRs demonstrated similar stimulus intensity dependence, with lower thresholds and greater amplitudes in females than males.

    Conclusions:

    • The observed differences in eeABRs are attributed to the lack of natural cochlear mechanisms in cochlear implant recipients.
    • Despite differences, both eeABRs and aeABRs show comparable responses to stimulus intensity and sex-based variations.
    • These findings highlight the altered neural processing pathways utilized by cochlear implants.