Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Task-dependent costs in processing two simultaneous auditory stimuli.

Frederick J Gallun1, Christine R Mason, Gerald Kidd

  • 1Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. frederick.gallun@va.gov

Perception & Psychophysics
|October 13, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Examining the Role of Pre-Operative Retrolisthesis in Single-Level Lumbar Fusion: Impact on Reoperation Rates.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Salvage Posterior C1-C2 Fusion for Odontoid Nonunion After Failed Nonoperative Management: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison with Primary Fusion.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Characterizing Auditory Deficits in Veterans With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Principal Component Analysis Approach.

American journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Public Health.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

The influence of uncertainty about ear of presentation, gender, and linguistic structure in following streams of speech.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025
Same author

At-Home Auditory Assessment Using Portable Automated Rapid Testing (PART) to Understand Self-Reported Hearing Difficulties.

Trends in hearing·2025
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Understanding speech in noisy environments involves selective and divided attention. This study reveals that processing two speech signals simultaneously depends on task demands and resource competition, not just interference.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory neuroscience
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Speech processing

Background:

  • Listeners often face competing auditory information, requiring them to focus on one sound while ignoring others.
  • Distinguishing between selective attention (ignoring a distractor) and divided attention (multitasking) is crucial for understanding auditory processing limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate the attentional costs of selective attention from those of divided attention in auditory processing.
  • To investigate how task demands and cueing affect the ability to process two simultaneous speech signals.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed auditory tasks with two speech-in-noise stimuli presented dichotically (to separate ears).
  • Tasks involved either identifying keywords in both stimuli or identifying keywords in one and detecting speech in the other.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Cueing conditions included advance knowledge of the target ear (single task) or a subsequent cue (partial-report dual task).

    • Main Results:

    • Performance decreased significantly when both tasks required speech identification compared to single-task conditions.
    • When tasks involved different judgments (identification and detection), performance decrements were smaller, especially with later cueing.
    • These findings suggest that competition for limited cognitive resources significantly impacts dual-task performance.

    Conclusions:

    • Simultaneous processing of dichotic speech is constrained by both stimulus interference and the competition for shared, limited processing resources.
    • The cognitive architecture supporting auditory attention involves mechanisms that can be overloaded by demanding tasks.
    • Future research should explore the specific structural mechanisms underlying these limited processing resources.