Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Detecting chance: a solution to the null sensitivity problem in subliminal priming.

Jeffrey N Rouder1, Richard D Morey, Paul L Speckman

  • 1Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA. rouderj@missouri.edu

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|November 2, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing qualitative individual differences with Bayesian hierarchical latent-mixture models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same author

Random-effects psychophysics for studying individual differences in perception and cognition.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Estimating correlations across tasks in experimental psychology.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

The role of reliability in experiments.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same author

Features without their locations in visual working memory: Evidence from change-detection tasks.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Localizing structure in individual differences: A visual illusion case study.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a new statistical model to accurately assess if subliminal stimuli are truly undetectable. This Bayesian approach helps researchers identify participants with genuine undetectability, improving the reliability of subliminal priming research.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Statistics

Background:

  • Subliminal priming research often depends on demonstrating stimulus undetectability.
  • Traditional significance tests are inadequate, as null results can stem from low statistical power rather than true undetectability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel statistical model for evaluating the undetectability of stimuli in experimental paradigms.
  • To offer a method for estimating the probability of true chance performance for individual participants.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a hierarchical statistical model.
  • Estimation of individual probabilities of being at chance using a Bayesian framework.

Main Results:

  • The model provides estimates for the probability of true undetectability for each individual.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Researchers can use these probabilities to select participants with high confidence in their undetectability.

    • Conclusions:

    • The proposed Bayesian model offers a more robust alternative to standard significance testing for assessing stimulus undetectability.
    • This approach enhances the rigor and interpretability of findings in subliminal perception research.