Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The rationale for developing scoring systems for clinical practice.

Mark K Ferguson1

  • 1Section of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue MC 5035, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. mferguso@surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu

Thoracic Surgery Clinics
|December 13, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of atrial arrhythmias on long-term survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research·2026
Same author

Gender-based differences in perceptions of artificial intelligence in clinical cardiothoracic surgery.

JTCVS open·2026
Same author

What should lung cancer patients know before surgery? A Delphi consensus study.

JTCVS open·2026
Same author

Intraoperative arteriovenous patient sampling to assess in situ non-small cell lung cancer metabolism.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2026
Same author

European Respiratory Society and European Society of Thoracic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on fitness for curative intent treatment of lung cancer.

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery·2025
Same author

European Respiratory Society and European Society of Thoracic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on fitness for curative intent treatment of lung cancer.

The European respiratory journal·2025
Same journal

Pleuropulmonary Infectious Diseases: Impact of the Diseases and the Scarce Literature.

Thoracic surgery clinics·2026
Same journal

TB or Not TB-Septic or Resect? That Is the Question.

Thoracic surgery clinics·2026
Same journal

Surgery for Pulmonary Aspergillosis.

Thoracic surgery clinics·2026
Same journal

Current Treatment for Mediastinitis.

Thoracic surgery clinics·2026
Same journal

Surgical Management of Pulmonary Mucormycosis.

Thoracic surgery clinics·2026
Same journal

Surgical Management of Pulmonary Hydatid Disease.

Thoracic surgery clinics·2026
See all related articles

Risk scoring systems in thoracic surgery are underutilized and require improvement. While effective for predicting mortality in large groups, they lack precision for individual patient outcomes, especially nonfatal complications.

Area of Science:

  • Thoracic Surgery
  • Medical Informatics
  • Predictive Analytics

Background:

  • Risk scoring systems are infrequently employed in thoracic surgery.
  • Existing systems adequately predict rare events like operative mortality.
  • Most current systems lack sufficient evaluation for predicting nonfatal complications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the current state and limitations of risk scoring systems in thoracic surgery.
  • To highlight the need for improved predictive models for postoperative complications.
  • To underscore the importance of accurate risk stratification for patient care and research.

Main Methods:

  • Review and analysis of existing risk scoring systems in thoracic surgery.
  • Evaluation of the predictive capabilities of current systems for mortality and nonfatal complications.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of the suitability of current systems for individual patient risk stratification.

    • Main Results:

    • Current risk scoring systems are well-suited for risk stratification in large patient cohorts.
    • These systems demonstrate limitations in accurately predicting outcomes for individual patients.
    • Adequate evaluation for predicting nonfatal complications is lacking for most extant systems.

    Conclusions:

    • Improving clinical and biological predictive systems for postoperative complications is crucial.
    • Enhanced risk prediction can improve patient selection and informed consent.
    • Better risk stratification aids research, internal audits, and resource allocation for postoperative management.