Related Experiment Videos
Potential reasons why physicians underuse lung-protective ventilation: a retrospective cohort study using physician
Mark E Mikkelsen1, Pali M Dedhiya, Ravi Kalhan
1Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. mark.mikkelsen@uphs.upenn.edu
Background:
Physicians often fail to use lung-protective ventilation (LPV) in patients with acute lung injury.
Objective:
To use physician documentation to identify why physicians did not initiate or continue LPV in patients with acute lung injury.
Methods:
This was a retrospective cohort study in a university hospital. The study period was September 2000 through November 2002. In our primary analysis, LPV was defined as use of a tidal volume < or = 7.5 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW). We also conducted a sensitivity analysis in which we defined LPV as use of a tidal volume < or = 6.0 mL/kg PBW.
Results:
In our primary analysis, in 42 (56%) of 75 cases, physicians used or intended to use LPV. Of these 42 subjects, 12 received LPV transiently, and 6 never received LPV, despite the fact that the physician ordered or documented LPV use. In 21 of the 33 remaining cases the physicians documented concerns or clinical criteria that may explain why LPV was not used: relative contraindications to LPV (n = 2), change of care goal to comfort care only (n = 1), rapid resolution of hypoxemia (n = 4), and consideration of alternative diagnoses for which LPV was not indicated (n = 14). Of the 12 cases where LPV was used transiently, diagnostic uncertainty (n = 6) was a common finding. The sensitivity analysis yielded explanations in similar proportions.
Conclusions:
LPV, once initiated, is often discontinued. Uncertainty in the diagnosis of acute lung injury appears to be an important barrier to initiating and continuing LPV, whereas concerns regarding metabolic acidosis and clinical changes (hypoxemia improved) may prevent the initiation of LPV. Even when physicians believe they are using LPV, they may not be, which suggests that protocol-implementation failure is an important barrier to use of LPV.
Related Concept Videos
01:20Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
01:23Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like asthma or COPD,...
01:19Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
01:21Methods of Documentation III: PIE
01:30Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
01:19Factors Affecting Pulmonary Ventilation
Alveolar Surface Tension
The alveolar fluid lines the luminal surface of the alveoli and exerts a force called surface tension. This force is caused by the polar water molecules in the liquid being more strongly attracted to each...