Outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation - predictors of survival
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
Osama Ishtiaq1, Muhammad Iqbal, Muhammad Zubair
1Department of Medicine, Shifa College of Medicine, Islamabad, Pakistan. osama@pakmedinet.com
Objective:
To assess the outcomes of patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
Design:
A cross-sectional study.
Place And Duration Of Study:
Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad from January 2005 to December 2005.
Patients And Methods:
Data were collected retrospectively of all adult patients who underwent CPR. Clinical outcomes of interest were survival at the end of CPR and survival at discharge from hospital. Factors associated with survival were evaluated using logistic regression analysis.
Results:
Of the 159 patients included, 55 (35%) were alive at the end of CPR and 17 (11%) were discharged alive from the hospital. At the end of CPR, univariate logistic regression analysis found the following factors associated with survival: cardiac arrest within hospital as compared to outside the hospital (odds ratio = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.27-6.20, p-value = 0.01), both cardiac and pulmonary arrest as compared to either cardiac or pulmonary arrest (odds ratio = 0.37, 95%CI = 0.19- 0.73, p-value = 0.004), asystole as cardiac rhythm at presentation (odds ratio = 0.47, 95%CI = 0.24-0.93, p-value = 0.03), and total atropine dose given during CPR (odds ratio = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.62-0.97, p-value = 0.02). In multivariate logistic regression, cardiac arrest within hospital (odds ratio = 2.52, 95%CI = 1.06-5.99, p-value = 0.04) and both cardiac and pulmonary arrest as compared to cardiac or pulmonary arrest (odds ratio = 0.44, 95%CI = 0.21-0.91, p-value = 0.03) were associated with survival at the end of CPR. At the time of discharge from hospital, univariate logistic regression analysis found following factors that were associated with survival: cardiac arrest within hospital (odds ratio = 8.4, 95%CI = 1.09-65.64, p-value = 0.04), duration of CPR (odds ratio = 0.91, 95%CI = 0.85-0.96, p-value = 0.001), and total atropine does given during CPR (odds ratio = 0.68, 95%CI = 0.47-0.99, p-value = 0.05). In multivariate logistic regression analysis cardiac arrest within hospital (odds ratio = 8.69, 95%CI = 1.01-74.6, p-value = 0.05) and duration of CPR (odds ratio = 0.92, 95%CI = 0.87-0.98, p-value = 0.01) were associated with survival at discharge from hospital.
Conclusion:
In-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest was associated with better clinical outcomes as compared to outside hospital arrest. Public education is needed to improve clinical outcomes in patients who need CPR outside hospital.
More Related Videos
09:47A Rat Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Resuscitation by Conventional Closed-chest Technique
Published on: April 26, 2015
10:55A Piglet Perinatal Asphyxia Model to Study Cardiac Injury and Hemodynamics after Cardiac Arrest, Resuscitation, and the Return of Spontaneous Circulation
Published on: January 13, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management