Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Impact of Common Fruit Juices and Toothbrushing on the Discoloration of Primary Teeth
Published on: March 27, 2026
Child toothbrush abrasion effect on ionomeric materials
Fabíola G Carvalho1, Suzana B P Fucio, Andréia B Paula
1Department of Restorative Dentistry-Dental Materials Program, Dental School of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Resin-modified glass ionomer cements exhibited significantly higher surface roughness after toothbrush abrasion compared to conventional glass ionomer cements. Toothbrush bristle type did not significantly impact roughness, with extra-soft-parallel bristles showing no difference from soft-parallel or cross bristles.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Surface Characterization
Background:
- Glass ionomer cements are widely used dental restorative materials.
- Assessing the long-term surface integrity of dental materials under mechanical stress is crucial.
- Toothbrush abrasion is a common factor affecting the surface properties of dental restorations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the abrasive effects of different toothbrush bristle types on conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
- To evaluate the in vitro surface roughness changes of two glass ionomer cement types after simulated toothbrushing.
- To determine if toothbrush bristle design influences the surface roughness of glass ionomer cements.
Main Methods:
- In vitro evaluation of surface roughness using a surface roughness-measuring device.
- Simulated toothbrushing abrasion using three types of toothbrushes (soft-cross, extra-soft-parallel, soft-parallel) and a dentifrice slurry.
- Standardized testing conditions: 37°C, 24 hours humidity, 250 cycles/minute, 200g load.
- Comparison of surface roughness before and after abrasion for conventional (C) and resin-modified (V) glass ionomer cements.
Main Results:
- No significant interaction was found between glass ionomer cement type and toothbrush bristle type.
- Resin-modified glass ionomer cement (V) demonstrated significantly higher surface roughness compared to conventional glass ionomer cement (C) after abrasion.
- Soft-cross bristles (CB) resulted in higher surface roughness than soft-parallel bristles (S) on resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
- No significant difference in surface roughness was observed when using extra-soft-parallel bristles (ES) compared to soft-parallel or soft-cross bristles.
Conclusions:
- Resin-modified glass ionomer cements are more susceptible to surface roughening from toothbrush abrasion than conventional glass ionomer cements.
- The type of toothbrush bristle (soft-cross, extra-soft-parallel, soft-parallel) did not significantly alter the overall abrasive effect on either cement type.
- Clinical recommendations for toothbrush selection may need to consider the material properties of glass ionomer restorations to minimize surface degradation.

