Related Experiment Videos
What factors explain the differences in morbidity estimations among general practice registration networks in the
Catharina van den Dungen1, Nancy Hoeymans, Ronald Gijsen
1National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands. karin.van.den.dungen@rivm.nl
Background:
Information on the incidence and prevalence of diseases is a core indicator for public health. There are several ways to estimate morbidity in a population (e.g., surveys, healthcare registers). In this paper, we focus on one particular source: general practice based registers. Dutch general practice is a potentially valid source because nearly all non-institutionalized inhabitants are registered with a general practitioner (GP), and the GP fulfils the role as "gatekeeper". However, there are some unexplained differences among morbidity estimations calculated from the data of various general practice registration networks (GPRNs).
Objective:
To describe and categorize factors that may explain the differences in morbidity rates from different GPRNs, and to provide an overview of these factors in Dutch GPRNs.
Results:
Four categories of factors are distinguished: "healthcare system", "methodological characteristics", "general practitioner", and "patient". The overview of 11 Dutch GPRNs reveals considerable differences in factors.
Conclusion:
Differences in morbidity estimation depend on factors in the four categories. Most attention is dedicated to the factors in the "methodology characteristics" category, mainly because these factors can be directly influenced by the GPRN.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness, disability,...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.