Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Clean Sampling and Analysis of River and Estuarine Waters for Trace Metal Studies
Published on: July 1, 2016
Further study on a flow injection on-line multiplexed sorption preconcentration coupled with flame atomic absorption
Yan Li1, Yan Jiang, Xiu-Ping Yan
1State Key Laboratory of Functional Polymer Materials for Adsorption and Separation, and Research Center for Analytical Sciences, College of Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.
Abstract:
A further study on a newly developed flow injection (FI) on-line multiplexed sorption preconcentration (MSP) using a knotted reactor coupled with flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) was carried out to demonstrate its applicability and limitation for trace element determination. For this purpose, Cr(VI), Cu(II), Ni(II) and Co(II) were selected as the analytes, and detailed comparison was made between the MSP-FAAS and conventional FI on-line sorption preconcentration FAAS in respect to retention efficiency and linear ranges of absorbance versus sample loading flow rate and total preconcentration time. Introduction of an air-flow for removal of the residual solution in the KR after each sub-injection in the MSP procedure played a decisive role in the improvement of retention efficiency. The linearity of absorbance versus sample loading flow rate or total preconcentration time was extended to a more degree for the metal ions with less stability of their PDC (pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate) complexes than those with more stable PDC complexes. It seems that the MSP procedure behaves advantages beyond the inflection points in the diagrams of absorbance versus total preconcentration time and sample loading flow rate obtained by conventional (a single continuous) preconcentration procedure. With a sample loading flow rate of 6.0mlmin(-1) and a total preconcentration time of 180s, the retention efficiencies were increased from 25, 46, 41 and 63% with a single continuous sorption preconcentration to 44, 78, 65 and 75% with a six sub-injection preconcentration procedure for Cr(VI), Co(II), Ni(II), and Cu(II), respectively. The detection limits were 0.40, 0.33, 0.31 and 0.26mugl(-1) for Cr(VI), Co(II), Ni(II), and Cu(II), respectively. The precision (R.S.D.) for eleven replicate determination of 2mugl(-1) Cr(VI), Co(II) and Ni(II), and 1mugl(-1) Cu(II), was 2.1, 4.1, 2.6 and 1.7%, respectively.
Related Concept Videos
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Lab
Solutions containing organic solvents, such as low-molecular-mass alcohols, esters, or ketones, enhance absorbances by increasing nebulizer...
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Instrumentation
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Atomization Methods
Atomic Fluorescence Spectroscopy
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Interference
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Overview
When irradiated by EMR of a particular wavelength, these...

