Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026
06:16
A Probing Device for Quantitatively Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues during Arthroscopy
Published on: May 1, 2020
History of arthrography
Jeffrey J Peterson1, Laura W Bancroft
1Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA. peterson.jeffrey@mayo.edu
Radiologic Clinics of North America
|April 14, 2009
Summary
Arthrography has advanced from basic X-rays to modern CT and MR techniques. Despite decreased use, arthrography remains valuable for joint anatomy and internal derangement diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Radiology
- Orthopedics
Background:
- Arthrography techniques have evolved significantly over the past century.
- Early methods involved basic radiographic imaging after joint procedures.
- Modern advancements include computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography.
Observation:
- The peak usage of arthrography was observed during the 1960s and 1970s.
- The advent of cross-sectional imaging, such as CT and MR imaging, led to a decline in arthrography indications for many joints.
- Despite this trend, arthrography retains its utility in specific diagnostic scenarios.
Findings:
- Arthrography continues to offer crucial anatomical insights into joint structures.
- It provides precise visualization of internal derangements within joints.
- Modern CT and MR arthrography enhance diagnostic accuracy and detail.
Implications:
- Arthrography remains a relevant diagnostic tool in musculoskeletal radiology.
- It complements cross-sectional imaging by providing unique joint-specific information.
- The technique is essential for accurate diagnosis of internal joint derangements, aiding clinical decision-making.